Carbon steel piping (e.g., ASME SA-106, SA-53), is installed in many industrial applications (i.e., diesel generator exhaust manifold) where the internal gas flow subjects the piping to successive short time exposures at elevated temperatures up to 1100°F. A typical design of this piping without consideration for creep-fatigue cumulative damage is at least incomplete if not inappropriate. Also, a design for creep-fatigue, usually employed for long-term exposure to elevated temperatures, would be too conservative and will impose replacement of the carbon steel piping with heat-resistant CrMo steel piping. The existing ASME Standard procedures do not explicitly provide acceptance criteria for the design qualification to withstand these intermittent exposures to elevated temperatures. The serviceability qualification proposed is based on the evaluation of equivalent full temperature cycles which are presumed/expected to be experienced by the exhaust piping during the design operating life of the diesel engine. The proposed serviceability analysis consists of: (a) determination of the permissible stress at elevated temperatures, and (b) estimation of creep-fatigue damage for the total expected cycles of elevated temperature exposures following the procedure provided in ASME Code Cases N-253-6 and N-47-28.

1.
ASM, 1990, Metals Handbook Vol. 1, 10th Edition, “Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels, and High-Performance Alloys,” ASM International, Materials Park, OH 44073.
2.
ASME, 1989, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, through 1992 Addenda.
3.
ASME, 1989, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, through 1992 Addenda.
4.
ASME, 1990, Code for Pressure Piping, Section B31.3, “Chemical Plant and Petroleum Refinery Piping.”
5.
ASME, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Case N-253-6 “Construction of Class 2 or Class 3 Components for Elevated Temperature Service.”
6.
ASME, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Case N-47-28 “Class 1 Components in Elevated Temperature Service.”
7.
ASTM E139-83 “Conducting Creep, Creep-Rupture, and Stress Rupture Tests of Metallic Materials.”
8.
Booker, M. K., and Booker, B. L. P., 1983, “Analysis of Elevated Temperature Tensile and Creep Properties of Wrought Carbon Steels,” Proceedings of the 4th National Congress on Pressure Vessels and Piping Technology, Portland, OR, ASME, New York, NY.
9.
Conway, J. B., 1985, “Creep-Fatigue Interaction,” Metals Handbook Vol. 8, 9th Edition, ASM, Metals Park, OH, pp. 346–360.
10.
Dhalla
A. K.
,
1987
, “
A Simplified Procedure to Classify Stresses for Elevated Temperature Service
,” Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference,
ASME PVP
-Vol.
120
, pp.
177
188
.
11.
IIW Guidance, 1990, “Assessment-Fitness for Purpose of Welded Structures,” International Institute of Welding, Document IIW/IIS-SST-1157-90, Cambridge, U.K.
12.
Manson, S. S., 1982, “A Critical Review of Predictive Methods for Treatment of Time-Dependent Metal Fatigue at High Temperatures,” Pressure Vessels and Piping Design Technology—A Decade of Progress, ASME.
13.
Ratiu
M. D.
,
Hau
G.
,
Chao
S.
,
1990
, “
Alternate Procedure for Evaluation of Non-Linear Stress and Strain for Thermal Expansion Loading
,” Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Nashville, TN,
ASME PVP
-Vol.
197
, pp.
307
310
.
14.
Ratiu
M. D.
, and
Moisidis
N. T.
,
1993
, “
Serviceability of Carbon Steel Piping to Intermittent Elevated Temperatures
,” Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Denver, CO,
ASME PVP
-Vol.
265
, pp.
49
58
.
15.
Viswanathan, R., 1989, “Damage Mechanisms and Life Assessment of High Temperature Components,” ASM International, Metals Park, OH.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.