Within the last two decades, the use of elastic finite element analyses to demonstrate design compliance with the rules of the ASME Code has become a generally accepted engineering practice. Linearized stresses from these analyses are commonly used to evaluate primary stresses. For redundant structures or complex structural details, the use of such analyses, instead of simple equilibrium models, often results in significant overconservatism. Direct use of finite element results is often preferred because equilibrium solutions are not unique and effective equilibrium models are not easily constructed for complex three-dimensional structures. However, finite element analyses include secondary stresses, even for pressure, mechanical, and shock loading. For primary stress evaluation, the ASME Code allows the use of inelastic methods based on lower-bound solutions and plastic analysis. For primary stresses, the Code requires equilibrium to be satisfied without violating the yield strength of the material. The use of finite element inelastic analysis to partition mechanically induced stresses into the primary and secondary categories was introduced by Porowski et al. (1993). The latter provides a detailed discussion of the technical approach and the results for the axisymmetric junction between the plate and shell in a pressure vessel. This example was selected by the Session Organizer as a benchmark case to compare the efficiency of various analytical approaches presented at the Session. The authors have since used this approach to design more efficient structures. The practical application of this method to reduce the weight of complex redundant structures designed to meet primary stress limits is described herein for a more complex three-dimensional case. Plastic design utilizes the ability of actual materials to find the most efficient load distribution. A heat exchanger subjected to pressure, accelerations, and nozzle external loads is evaluated as a practical example. The results of elastic analyses are compared with those obtained by inelastic analyses. It is shown that inelastic analyses can be used effectively to reduce the weight of structures using only modern PCs for the engineering computations, as illustrated in this paper.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Papers
Weight-Saving Plastic Design of Pressure Vessels
J. S. Porowski,
J. S. Porowski
O’Donnell, Porowski and Associates Inc., Pittsburgh, PA 15208
Search for other works by this author on:
W. J. O’Donnell,
W. J. O’Donnell
O’Donnell, Porowski and Associates Inc., Pittsburgh, PA 15208
Search for other works by this author on:
R. H. Reid
R. H. Reid
R. H. Reid Consulting Engineers, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA 15217
Search for other works by this author on:
J. S. Porowski
O’Donnell, Porowski and Associates Inc., Pittsburgh, PA 15208
W. J. O’Donnell
O’Donnell, Porowski and Associates Inc., Pittsburgh, PA 15208
R. H. Reid
R. H. Reid Consulting Engineers, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA 15217
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. May 1997, 119(2): 161-166 (6 pages)
Published Online: May 1, 1997
Article history
Received:
June 25, 1995
Revised:
July 18, 1996
Online:
February 11, 2008
Citation
Porowski, J. S., O’Donnell, W. J., and Reid, R. H. (May 1, 1997). "Weight-Saving Plastic Design of Pressure Vessels." ASME. J. Pressure Vessel Technol. May 1997; 119(2): 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2842278
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
The Behavior of Elbow Elements at Pure Bending Applications Compared to Beam and Shell Element Models
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February 2025)
Related Articles
Ratcheting Assessment of a Fixed Tube Sheet Heat Exchanger Subject to In Phase Pressure and Temperature Cycles
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2011)
An Analytical Method for Cylindrical Shells With Nozzles Due to Internal Pressure and External Loads—Part II: Design Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (June,2010)
Leak Before Break Analysis of Steam Generator Shell Nozzle Junction for Sodium Cooled Fast Breeder Reactor
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (April,2012)
Creep-Fatigue Assessment Methods Using Elastic Analysis Results and Adjustments
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February,1991)
Related Chapters
Analysis of Components: Strain- and Deformation-Controlled Limits
Design & Analysis of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Components in the Creep Range
Analysis of Components Strain and Deformation-Controlled Limits
Analysis of ASME Boiler, Pressure Vessel, and Nuclear Components in the Creep Range
Part 2, Section II—Materials and Specifications
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Second Edition