It may be necessary to provide a radial opening such as gas evacuator holes, or an opening to operate the unlocking of the bolt mechanism by means of exhaust gases, in a gun barrel, which is a thick walled cylinder. A three dimensional finite element analysis has been performed to evaluate the effect of introducing a radial cross-bore in an autofrettaged thick-walled cylinder. From the analysis of the cross-bored autofrettaged cylinder, it was observed that there is a severe localized change in the residual stress profile in the vicinity of the cross-bore. The residual circumferential stress increases in compression at the bore. Similarly it increases in tension at the outer diameter, thus making the outer diameter more vulnerable to fatigue failure or crack initiation under stresses arising as a result of firing. Analyses were also performed by varying the cross-bore diameter and it was observed that, by increasing the diameter of the radial hole, the residual circumferential stress at the bore reduces, while it increases at the outer diameter, with an increase in the cross bore diameter. The re-pressurization pressure of an autofrettaged cylinder with radial cross-bore was found to be approximately 65 percent less than the actual autofrettage pressure in a particular case discussed in this paper. A comparison is also made with the residual stress field which would result if the cross-bore was machined before autofrettage.

1.
Bland
,
D. R.
,
1956
, “
Elasto-plastic Thick Walled Tube of Work Hardening Material Subjected to Internal and External Pressure and to Temperature Gradients
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
,
4
, pp.
209
229
.
2.
Chen, P. C. T., 1986, “A New Method of Predicting Residual Stresses in Autofrettaged Gun Barrel,” Technical report No. ARCCB-TR86012., US Army Research and Development Center Benet Weapon Laboratory., Watervliet, NY 12189-4050.
3.
Hameed. A., Brown, R. D., and Hetherington, J. G., 1998, “Comparison of the Residual Stresses in a Gun Barrel Due to the Process of Autofrettage (Evaluated Using Sachs Method) With That of Simulated Autofrettaged Model Using the Finite Element Method,” Vth European Indirect Fire Symposium, Cranfield University RMCS, Shrivenham, SN6 8LA.
4.
Masu
,
L. M.
,
1997
, “
ross-Bore Configuration and Size Effect on the Stress Distribution in Thick-walled Cylinders
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
72
, pp.
171
176
.
5.
Masu
,
L. M.
,
1994
, “
Plastic Analysis and Cross-bore Size Effects on the Fatigue Strength of Thick-Walled Cylinders
,”
East African Journal of Engineering
,
1
(
2
), pp.
22
22
.
6.
Faupel
,
J. H.
, and
Harris
,
B.
,
1957
, “
Stress Concentration in Heavy Walled Cylindrical Pressure Vessels: Effect of Elliptical and Circular Side Holes
,”
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
,
49
(
12
), pp.
1979
1986
.
7.
Cole
,
B. N.
,
Craggs
,
G.
, and
Ficenec
,
I.
,
1976
, “
Strength of Cylinders Containing Radial or Offset Cross-Bores
,”
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
,
18
(
6
), pp.
279
286
.
8.
Tan
,
C. L.
,
1986
, “
Stress Distribution in Thick-Walled Cylinders Due to Introduction of Cross-Bore after Autofrettage
,”
J. Strain Anal.
,
21
(
3
), pp.
177
183
.
9.
Fessler
,
H.
, and
Lewin
,
B. H.
,
1956
, “
Stress Distribution in a Tee Junction of Thick-Pipes
,”
Br. J. Appl. Phys.
,
1
, pp.
76
79
.
10.
Morrison
,
J. L. M.
,
Crossland
,
B.
, and
Parry
,
J. S. C.
,
1972
, “
Fatigue Strength of Cylinders With Side Holes and Cross-Holes
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
94
, pp.
815
824
.
11.
Murthy
,
M. V. V.
, and
Bapu Rao
,
M. N.
,
1970
, “
Stresses in a Cylindrical Shell Weakened by an Elliptic Hole with Major Axis Perpendicular to Shell Axis
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
37
, pp.
530
541
.
12.
Fenner
,
R. T.
, and
Nadiri
,
F.
,
1985
, “
On the use of Elliptical Side Branches to Thick-Walled Cylinders
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
20
, pp.
139
154
.
13.
Crossland, B., and Skelton, W. J., 1967, “Effect of Varying Hardness on the Fatigue Strength of Thick-Walled Cross-bore Cylinders of En 25,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 182, (Part 3C), pp. 106–114.
14.
Austin, B. A., and Crossland, B., 1965, “Low Endurance Fatigue Strength of Thick-Walled Cylinders: Development of a Testing Machine and Preliminary Results,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 180, (Part 1), IMechE, UK, p. 43.
15.
Chaaban, A., and Burns, D. J., 1986, “Design of High Pressure Vessels With Radial Cross-Bores,” Physica, 130 and 140B, pp. 766–772.
16.
Desjardins
,
J. L.
,
Burns
,
D. J.
, and
Thompson
,
J. C.
,
1991
, “
Weight Function Technique for Estimating Stress Intensity Factors for Cracks in High Pressure Vessels
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
113
(
1
), pp.
10
21
.
17.
Chaaban, A., Leung, K., and Burns, D. J., 1986, “Residual Stresses in Autofrettaged Thick-Walled, High Pressure Vessels,” ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Div Publication, 110, ASME, New York, pp. 55–60.
18.
Franklin, G. J., and Morison, J. L. M., 1960, “Autofrettage of Cylinders: Prediction of Pressure/External Expansion Curves and Calculation of Residual Stresses,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 174(3), IMechE, UK, pp. 947–974.
19.
Parker
,
A. P.
, and
Underwood
,
J. H.
,
1996
, “
Stress Concentration, Stress Intensity and Fatigue Crack Growth Along Evacuators of Pressurized, Autofrettaged Tubes
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
118
, pp.
336
343
.
20.
Underwood, J. H., Parker, A. P., Corrigan, D. J., and Audino, M. J., 2003, “Fatigue Life Measurements and Analysis for Overstrained Tubes with Evacuator Holes,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., pp. 424–428.
21.
Parker, A.P., 2003, private communication.
You do not currently have access to this content.