This paper describes the design of a new magnetic flux leakage (MFL) inspection tool that performs an inline inspection to detect and characterize both metal loss and mechanical damage defects. An inspection tool that couples mechanical damage assessment as part of a routine corrosion inspection is expected to have considerably better prospects for application in the pipeline industry than a tool that complicates existing procedures. The design is based on study results that show it is feasible to detect and assess mechanical damage by applying a low magnetic field level in addition to the high magnetic field employed by most inspection tools. Nearly all commercially available MFL tools use high magnetic fields to detect and size metal loss such as corrosion. A lower field than is commonly applied for detecting metal loss is appropriate for detecting mechanical damage, such as the metallurgical changes caused by impacts from excavation equipment. The lower field is needed to counter the saturation effect of the high magnetic field, which masks and diminishes important components of the signal associated with mechanical damage. Finite element modeling was used in the design effort and the results have shown that a single magnetizer with three poles is the most effective design. Furthermore, it was found that for the three-pole system the high magnetization pole must be in the center, which was an unexpected result. The three-pole design has mechanical advantages, including a magnetic null in the backing bar, which enables installation of a pivot point for articulation of the tool through bends and restrictions. This design was prototyped and tested at Battelle’s Pipeline Simulation Facility (West Jefferson, OH). The signals were nearly identical to results acquired with a single magnetizer reconfigured between tests to attain the appropriate high and low field levels.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 2005
Research Papers
The Design of a Mechanical Damage Inspection Tool Using Dual Field Magnetic Flux Leakage Technology
J. Bruce Nestleroth,
J. Bruce Nestleroth
Battelle
, 505 King Ave, Columbus, OH 43201
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard J. Davis
Richard J. Davis
Battelle
, 505 King Ave, Columbus, OH 43201
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Bruce Nestleroth
Battelle
, 505 King Ave, Columbus, OH 43201
Richard J. Davis
Battelle
, 505 King Ave, Columbus, OH 43201J. Pressure Vessel Technol. Aug 2005, 127(3): 274-283 (10 pages)
Published Online: March 1, 2005
Article history
Received:
December 30, 2004
Revised:
March 1, 2005
Citation
Nestleroth, J. B., and Davis, R. J. (March 1, 2005). "The Design of a Mechanical Damage Inspection Tool Using Dual Field Magnetic Flux Leakage Technology." ASME. J. Pressure Vessel Technol. August 2005; 127(3): 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1989349
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
The Behaviour of Elbow Elements at Pure Bending Applications Compared to Beam and Shell Element models
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
Measurement of Steam-Generator-Tube Vibration Damping Caused by Anti-Vibration-Bar Supports
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February 2025)
Related Articles
Profiles of Two JOMAE Associate Editors (A Continuing Series)
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (October,2021)
Non-Contact Measurement of Residual Magnetization Caused by Plastic Deformation of Steel
ASME J Nondestructive Evaluation (August,2020)
Small Diameter Remote Field Eddy Current Inspection for Unpiggable Pipelines
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2005)
Gas Coupled Ultrasonic Measurement of Pipeline Wall Thickness
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2005)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Probabilistic Approaches for Analysis of Inspection Data of Pipelines
Asset Integrity Management of Critical Infrastructure
Introduction
Computer Vision for Structural Dynamics and Health Monitoring
Overview of Section XI Stipulations
Online Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes