In the 1960s and 1970s, when the surveillance programs for currently operating commercial nuclear reactors were established, state of knowledge limitations resulted in the use of Charpy-V notch (CVN) specimens rather than fracture toughness specimens. Reasonable success has since been achieved in correlating CVN and fracture toughness parameters. Such correlations provide an important part of the technical basis for both current regulations and ASME codes. These correlations imply that trends manifest in CVN data must also appear in fracture toughness data, even though empirical evidence demonstrate that this is not always true. For example, the temperature dependence of CVN energy (CVE) in transition is thought to be a unique feature of each specific sample of ferritic steel that is tested, a view in sharp contrast with the now widely accepted view of a “master curve” for transition fracture toughness . Also, effects of product form on CVE temperature dependence and property correlations are widely reported, despite the fact that product form effects are absent from properties. These observations suggest that the mapping of CVE behavior onto fracture toughness implicit to correlation-based regulations and ASME codes may produce erroneous trends in estimated values of fracture toughness. In this paper we investigate the hypothesis that the apparent differences between CVE and fracture toughness arise due to differences in how the temperature dependence of CVE and data have historically been modeled. Our analysis shows that when CVE data are analyzed in a manner consistent with data (i.e., transition and upper shelf data are partitioned from each other and analyzed separately rather than being fit with a continuous tanh function), the apparent differences between CVE and toughness characterizations are minimized significantly, and may disappear entirely. These findings demonstrate the differences between CVE and fracture toughness data to be an artifact of the tanh analysis method rather than an intrinsic property of CVE.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2009
Research Papers
A Comparison of the tanh and Exponential Fitting Methods for Charpy V-Notch Energy Data
Marjorie Ann EricksonKirk,
erickson.peai@verizon.net
Marjorie Ann EricksonKirk
President
Phoenix Engineering Associates, Inc.
, Sykesville, MD 21784
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark T. EricksonKirk,
mark.kirk@nrc.gov
Mark T. EricksonKirk
Senior Materials Engineer
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
, Rockville, MD 20852
Search for other works by this author on:
Stan Rosinski,
strosins@epri.com
Stan Rosinski
Program Manager
Electric Power Research Institute
, Charlotte, NC
Search for other works by this author on:
Jack Spanner
jspanner@epri.com
Jack Spanner
Program Manager
Electric Power Research Institute
, Charlotte, NC
Search for other works by this author on:
Marjorie Ann EricksonKirk
President
Mark T. EricksonKirk
Senior Materials Engineer
Stan Rosinski
Program Manager
Jack Spanner
Program Manager
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. Jun 2009, 131(3): 031404 (13 pages)
Published Online: April 17, 2009
Article history
Received:
August 29, 2007
Revised:
June 30, 2008
Published:
April 17, 2009
Citation
EricksonKirk, M. A., EricksonKirk, M. T., Rosinski, S., and Spanner, J. (April 17, 2009). "A Comparison of the tanh and Exponential Fitting Methods for Charpy V-Notch Energy Data." ASME. J. Pressure Vessel Technol. June 2009; 131(3): 031404. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3109987
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Stress Analysis of ASME Section X Flanges Using Classical Lamination Theory
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (June 2023)
Theoretical Analysis of Free Vibration and Transient Response of Rectangular Plate–Cavity System Under Impact Loading
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (June 2023)
Integral Hydro-Bulge Forming Method of Spherical Pressure Vessels Using a Triangle Patch Polyhedron
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (June 2023)
Random Fatigue Analysis of Cryogenic Liquid Tanker Under Road Spectrum Load and a Simplified Algorithm
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (June 2023)
Related Articles
Validation of RT T 0 for German Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2008)
Effect of Loading Rate on Fracture Toughness of Pressure Vessel Steels
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (May,2000)
Dynamic Fracture Toughness and Charpy Transition Properties of a Service-Exposed 2.25Cr-1Mo Reheater Header Pipe
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (April,2003)
Estimation of Master Curve Based RT TO Reference Temperature From CVN Data
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2007)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Forging Strain Rate and Deformation Temperature Effects on the Fracture Toughness Properties of Type 304L Stainless Steel Precharged with Tritium
International Hydrogen Conference (IHC 2016): Materials Performance in Hydrogen Environments
Section VIII: Division 2—Alternative Rules
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 2, Second Edition: Criteria and Commentary on Select Aspects of the Boiler & Pressure Vessel and Piping Codes
Summary
Heat Transfer & Hydraulic Resistance at Supercritical Pressures in Power Engineering Applications