The stress intensity factor estimated by the appropriate modeling of components is essential for the evaluation of crack growth behavior in stress corrosion cracking. For the appropriate modeling of a welded component with a crack, it is important to understand the effects of residual stress distribution and the geometry of the component on the stress intensity factor of the surface crack. In this study, the stress intensity factors of surface cracks under two assumed residual stress fields were calculated. As residual stress field, a bending type stress field (tension-compression) and a self-equilibrating stress field (tension-compression-tension) through the thickness were assumed, respectively. The geometries of the components were plate and piping. The assumed surface cracks for those evaluations were a long crack in the surface direction and a semi-elliptical surface crack. In addition, crack growth evaluations were conducted to clarify the effects of residual stress distribution and the geometry of the component. Here, the crack growth evaluation means simulating increments of crack depth and length using crack growth properties and stress intensity factors. The effects of residual stress distribution and component geometry on the stress intensity factor of surface cracks and the appropriate modeling of cracked components are discussed by comparing the stress intensity factors and the crack growth evaluations for surface cracks under residual stress fields.

1.
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, 2004, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Sec. XI, Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components.
2.
Shiratori
,
M.
,
Miyoshi
,
T.
, and
Tanikawa
,
K.
, 1985, “
Analysis of Stress Intensity Factors for Surface Cracks Subjected to Arbitrarily Distributed Surface Stresses
,”
Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. A
0387-5008,
51
(
467
), pp.
1828
1835
.
3.
Shiratori
,
M.
,
Miyoshi
,
T.
,
Yu
,
Q.
, and
Mastumoto
,
T.
, 2000, “
Development of the Database of the Stress Intensity Factors for Nozzle Corner Cracks
,”
ASME PVP
, Vol.
400
, pp.
279
289
.
4.
Miyazaki
,
K.
,
Mochizuki
,
M.
,
Kanno
,
S.
,
Hayashi
,
M.
,
Shiratori
,
M.
, and
Yu
,
Q.
, 2002, “
Analysis of Stress Intensity Factor Due to Surface Crack Propagation in Residual Stress Fields Caused by Welding—Comparison of Influence Function Method and Inherent Strain Analysis
,”
JSME Int. J., Ser. A
1340-8046,
45
(
2
), pp.
199
207
.
5.
American Petroleum Institute
, 2000, Recommended Practice 579, Fitness for Service, 1st ed.
6.
Dong
,
P.
, and
Hong
,
J. K.
, 2001, “
Stress Intensity Factor Solutions for Welded Joints Subjected to Weld Residual Stresses
,”
ASME PVP
, Vol.
427
, pp.
71
83
.
7.
Dong
,
P.
, and
Hong
,
J. K.
, 2002, “
Consistent Treatment of Weld Residual Stresses in Facture Assessment
,”
ASME PVP
, Vol.
434
, pp.
89
99
.
8.
Dong
,
P.
, and
Rawls
,
G.
, 2003, “
Crack Growth Behaviors in a Residual Stress Field for Vessel Type Structures
,”
ASME PVP
, Vol.
464
, pp.
43
48
.
9.
Dong
,
P.
, 2004, “
On the Mechanics of Residual Stresses in Girth Welds
,”
ASME PVP
, Vol.
479
, pp.
119
124
.
10.
Miyazaki
,
K.
,
Numata
,
M.
,
Saito
,
K.
, and
Mochizuki
,
M.
, 2005, “
Effect of Distance From the Center of Weld to the Fixed End on Residual Stress and Stress Intensity Factor of the Piping Weld
,” ASME Paper No. PVP2005-71461.
11.
Mochizuki
,
M.
,
Enomoto
,
K.
,
Okamoto
,
N.
,
Saito
,
H.
, and
Hayashi
,
E.
, 1993, “
Welding Residual Stresses at the Intersection of a Small Diameter Pipe Penetrating a Thick Plate
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
0029-5493,
144
(
3
), pp.
439
447
.
12.
The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
, 2002, Rules on Fitness-for-Service for Nuclear Power Plants, JSME S NA1-2002.
13.
Cipolla
,
R. C.
, 1995, “
Technical Basis for the Revised Stress Intensity Factor Equation for Surface Flaws in ASME Section XI Appendix A
,”
ASME PVP
, Vol.
313-1
, pp.
105
121
.
14.
Shiratori
,
M.
,
Miyoshi
,
T.
,
Yu
,
Q.
,
Terakado
,
T.
, and
Mastumoto
,
T.
, 1999, “
Development of a Software System Estimating Stress Intensity Factors and Fatigue Crack Propagation for Three-Dimensional Surface Cracks by an Influence Function Method
,”
ASME PVP
, Vol.
385
, pp.
299
309
.
You do not currently have access to this content.