The Master Curve gives the relation between the median of fracture toughness of ferritic steels and the temperature in the ductile–brittle transition temperature region. The procedure used to determine the Master Curve is provided in the current American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E1921 standard. By considering the substitution of the alternative lower-bound curves based on the Master Curve approach for the KIc curves based on reference data sets in the present codes such as ASME Code Cases N-629 and N-631, the statistical characteristic should be well incorporated in the determination of the lower-bound curves. Appendix X4 in the ASTM standard describes the procedure used to derive the lower-bound curves; however, it appears to be addressed without sufficient consideration of the statistical reliability. In this study, we propose a rational determination method of lower-bound fracture toughness curves using the Master Curve approach. The method considers the effect of sample size in the determination of the tolerance-bound curve. The adequacy of the proposed method was verified by comparing the tolerance-bound curve with the fracture toughness database for national reactor pressure vessel (RPV) steels including plate and forging obtained from 4 T to 0.4 T C(T) specimens and 0.4 T SE(B) specimens. The method allows the application of the Master Curve using fewer specimens, which can coexist with the present surveillance program.
Rational Determination of Lower-Bound Fracture Toughness Curves Using Master Curve Approach
Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received January 23, 2013; final manuscript received June 25, 2013; published online October 10, 2013. Assoc. Editor: David L. Rudland.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Miura, N., Soneda, N., Sawai, S., and Sakai, S. (October 10, 2013). "Rational Determination of Lower-Bound Fracture Toughness Curves Using Master Curve Approach." ASME. J. Pressure Vessel Technol. December 2013; 135(6): 061211. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4025088
Download citation file: