Abstract

An extensive analysis of the fatigue life of a typical modern autofrettaged smoothbore tank barrel, cracked either internally or externally, in terms of the initial crack depth and shape, type and level of autofrettage, was conducted. Five overstraining cases were considered: no-autofrettage, 70% and 100% hydraulic autofrettage, and 70% and 100% swage autofrettage. KINmax, the maximum combined stress intensity factor (SIF) KINmax = (KIP + KIA) max, due to both internal pressure and autofrettage, as a function of crack depth for a large number of internal and external crack configurations was determined by the finite element method (FEM). A novel realistic experimentally based autofrettage model, incorporating the Bauschinger effect, was integrated into the finite element model, replicating both the hydraulic and swage autofrettage residual stress fields (RSFs) accurately. Fatigue lives were evaluated by integrating Paris' Law using the above values of KINmax. The following conclusions can be drawn from the results: hydraulic and swage autofrettage have a dramatic beneficial effect in extending the fatigue life of an overstrained barrel 4–11 times as compared to an identical nonautofrettaged tube. The fatigue life of overstrained barrels is controlled by internal cracking, for barrels overstrained by up to ε = 100% hydraulic autofrettage, by up to ε = 70% in the case of swage autofrettage, and by external cracking for ε = 100% swage autofrettaged. Eliminating or carefully designing stress concentrators on the tube's external face and keeping away from corrosive agents thus, extending the fatigue-crack initiation life of an external crack, enables the increase of the level of swage autofrettage to up to ε = 100%. Swage autofrettage is much more superior to hydraulic autofrettage. The fatigue life of a 70% swaged autofrettaged barrel is 1.5 times higher than that of a 100% hydraulically autofrettaged tube. If full swage autofrettage is permissible, the fatigue life of such a barrel is twofold that of a fully hydraulically autofrettaged tube. Unlike the commonly accepted concept, the level of hydraulic autofrettage should not be limited to 70%, and full hydraulic autofrettage should be used. Similarly, in the case of swage autofrettage, if the detrimental effect of external cracking is removed by proper design and maintenance of the tube's outer surface, the level of autofrettage can be increased to up to ε = 100%, thus, gaining an increase of 33% in the fatigue life as compared to overstraining the barrel to only ε = 70%. Initial crack depth and shape are major factors affecting the fatigue life of the barrel. The deeper the initial crack depth, a0, and the slenderer its shape, a/c 0, the shorter the fatigue life of the barrel.

References

1.
Military Machine
,
2019
, “
Top 20 Modern Battle Tanks
,” Military Machine, Aug. 19. https://militarymachine.com/battle-tank/
2.
Army Technology
,
2013
, “
The World's Top 10 Main Battle Tanks
,” Army Technology, New York, Nov. 28.
3.
Perl
,
M.
, and
Saley
,
T.
,
2017
, “
Swage and Hydraulic Autofrettage Impact on Fracture Endurance and Fatigue Life of an Internally Cracked Smooth Gun Barrel Part I—The Effect of Overstraining
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
,
182
, pp.
372
385
.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.05.022
4.
Perl
,
M.
, and
Saley
,
T.
,
2017
, “
Swage and Hydraulic Autofrettage Impact on Fracture Endurance and Fatigue Life of an Internally Cracked Smooth Gun Barrel Part II—The Combined Effect of Pressure and Overstraining
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
,
182
, pp.
386
399
.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.05.023
5.
Perl
,
M.
, and
Saley
,
T.
,
2019
, “
The Detrimental Effect of Swage and Hydraulic Autofrettage on Externally Cracked Modern Gun Barrels
,”
Defence Technol.
,
15
(
2
), pp.
146
153
.10.1016/j.dt.2018.10.001
6.
Perl
,
M.
, and
Saley
,
T.
,
2019
, “
The Cumulative Detrimental Impact of Pressure and Autofrettage on the Fatigue Life of an Externally Cracked Modern Tank Gun Barrel
,”
AIMS Mater. Sci.
,
6
(
5
), pp.
833
851
.10.3934/matersci.2019.5.833
7.
Aroné
,
R.
,
Perl
,
M.
,
Botstein
,
O.
,
Shpigler
,
B.
, and
Oshrat
,
Y.
,
1985
, “
Strength and Reliability of Gun Barrels
,” Israel Institute of Metals, Haifa, Israel, Report No.
5045
22
.
8.
Audino
,
J. M.
,
2006
, “
Use of Electroplated Chromium in Gun Barrels
,”
US Army RDECOM- ARDEC-Benet Laboratories, DoD Metal Finishing Workshop
, Washington, DC.https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a599804.pdf
9.
Underwood
,
J. H.
,
1998
, “
Stress Corrosion Cracking in a Gun Barrel Due to Tensile Residual Stress
,” Watertown, MA, Report No. MS 78-4 AMMRC.
10.
Clark
,
G.
,
1980
, “
Fracture Analysis of External Defects in the 105 mm Tank (L7A1) Gun Barrel
,” Material Research Laboratory, Australian Department of Defence, Canberra, Australia, Report No. MRL-R-765. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a093066.pdf
11.
Kapp
,
J. A.
,
1985
, “
Predicting Catastrophic Outside Diameter Initiated Fatigue Failure of Thick- Walled Cylinders Using Low Cycle Fatigue Data
,” Benet Weapons Laboratory, Watervliet, NY, ARRADCOM Technical Report
ARLCBTR-85035
.10.1557/PROC-22-243
12.
Tu
,
S. T.
, and
Zhang
,
X. C.
,
2016
, “
Fatigue Crack Initiation Mechanisms
,”
Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering
, Chap. 6, Elsevier Reference Collection, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.02852-6
13.
Paris
,
P. C.
,
Gomez
,
M. P.
, and
Anderson
,
W. E.
,
1961
, “
A Rational Analytic Theory of Fatigue
,”
Trend Eng.
,
13
, pp.
9
14
.https://imechanica.org/files/1961%20Paris%20Gomez%20Anderson%20A%20rational%20analytic%20theory%20of%20fatigue.pdf
14.
Morrison
,
J.
, and
Laforce
,
C. H.
,
1986
, “
Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Testing of Gun Steels
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
108
(
4
), pp.
507
513
.10.1115/1.3264821
15.
Lin
,
X. B.
, and
Smith
,
R. A.
,
1998
, “
Fatigue Growth Prediction of Internal Surface Cracks in Pressure Vessels
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
120
(
1
), pp.
17
23
.10.1115/1.2841878
16.
Busuttil
,
J. J.
, Jr.
, and
Kapp
,
J. A.
,
1986
, “
A Design Method for Autofrettaged Thick-Walled Cylinders With Outside Diameter Discontinuities
,” Benet Weapons Laboratory, Watervliet, NY, Report No.
ARCCB-TR-86009
.https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a166881.pdf
You do not currently have access to this content.