Abstract

ASME B31.3, the leading process piping system design code, has included in its 2018 edition a new procedure for evaluation of high cycle fatigue in process piping systems. As stated in the Appendix W of ASME B31.3-2018, this new procedure is applicable to any load resulting in the stress range in excess of 20.7 MPa (3.0 ksi) and with the total number of cycles exceeding 100,000. However, this new procedure is based on the stress range calculation typical to ASME B31 codes which underestimates the realistic expansion stress range by a factor of ∼2. While the allowable stress range used typically for fatigue evaluation of piping systems is adjusted to take into consideration this fact, the new fatigue design curves seem not to take it into account. Moreover, the applicability of the new design procedure (i.e., welded joint fatigue design curves) to the components which tend to fail away from the bends is questionable. Two examples are presented at the end of the paper in order to substantiate the indicated inconsistencies in the verification philosophy.

References

1.
ASME
,
2018
, “
Process Piping
,”
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
New York
, Standard No. B31.3.
2.
ASME
,
2019
, ASME BPVC Section VIII Division 2 Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels—Alternative Rules,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
New York
, Standard No. VIII-2.
3.
Jacimovic
,
N.
,
2019
, “
Uncertainties in Expansion Stress Evaluation Criteria in Piping Codes
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
169
, pp. 230–241. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.01.003
4.
Kalnins
,
A.
,
2001
, “
Fatigue Analysis of Pressure Vessels With Twice-Yield Plastic FEA
,” ASME Bound Vol. 419, pp.
43
52
.
5.
Kalnins
,
A.
,
2008
, “
Twice-Yield Method for Assessment of Fatigue Caused by Fast Thermal Transient According to 2007 Section VIII-Division 2 of ASME B&PV Code
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2008-61397.10.1115/PVP2008-61397
6.
Reinhardt
,
W.
,
2006
, “
Assessment of the Twice-Yield Method for Elastic-Plastic Fatigue Analysis
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2006-ICPVT-11-93004.10.1115/PVP2006-ICPVT-11-93004
7.
Hinnant
,
C.
,
2007
, “
Review of the Master SN Neuber Rule in the ASME Division 2 Rewrite Project
,”
ASME BPVC Code Week
, Atlanta, GA.https://www.scribd.com/document/399529032/Review-of-the-Master-SN-Neuber-Rule-in-the-ASME-Division-2-Rewrite-Project
8.
Dong
,
P.
,
Zao
,
C.
, and
Hong
,
J. K.
,
2006
, “
Low Cycle Fatigue Evaluation Using the Weld Master S-N Curve
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2006-ICPVT-11-93607.10.1115/PVP2006-ICPVT-11-93607
9.
Markl
,
A. R. C.
,
1947
, “
Fatigue Tests of Welding Elbows and Comparable Double-Miter Bends
,”
Trans. ASME
,
69
(
8
), pp.
869
879
.
10.
Markl
,
A. R. C.
, and
George
,
H. H.
,
1950
, “
Fatigue Tests on Flanged Assemblies
,”
Trans. ASME
, 72, pp.
77
87
.https://www.scribd.com/document/364374416/Fatigue-Tests-on-Flanged-Assemblies
11.
Markl
,
A. R. C.
,
1952
, “
Fatigue Tests of Piping Components
,”
Trans. ASME
,
74
(
3
), pp.
287
303
.
12.
Markl
,
A. R. C.
,
1955
, “
Piping-Flexibility Analysis
,”
Trans. ASME
, 77, pp.
127
149
.
13.
Hinnant
,
C.
, and
Paulin
,
T.
,
2008
, “
Experimental Evaluation of the Markl Fatigue Methods and ASME Piping Stress Intensification Factors
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2008-61871.10.1115/PVP2008-61871
14.
ASME,
2019
, “
Section III Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components
,”
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
New York
.
15.
ASME,
2017
, “
Stress Intensification Factors (i-Factors), Flexibility Factors (k-Factors), and Their Determination for Metallic Piping Components
,”
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
New York
, Standard No.
B31J
. https://www.asme.org/codes-standards/find-codes-standards/b31j-stress-intensification-factors-flexibility-factors-determination-metallic-piping-components
16.
Genic
,
S.
, and
Jacimovic
,
B.
,
2018
, “
A Shortcut to Determine Optimal Steam Pipe Diameter
,”
Chem. Eng. Prog.
,
114
(
8
), pp.
22
27
.https://www.aiche.org/resources/publications/cep/2018/august/shortcut-determine-optimal-steam-pipe-diameter
17.
Genic
,
S.
, and
Jacimovic
,
B.
,
2018
, “
A Shortcut to Optimize Pipe Diameters by Economic Criteria
,”
Chem. Eng.
,
116
(
12
), pp.
50
53
. https://www.chemengonline.com/shortcut-optimize-pipe-diameters-economic-criteria/
18.
Genic
,
S.
,
Jacimovic
,
B.
, and
Petrovic
,
A.
,
2018
, “
A Novel Method for Combined Entropy Generation and Economic Optimization of Counter-Current and Co-Current Heat Exchangers
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
136
, pp.
327
334
.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.03.026
19.
Milanovic
,
P.
,
Jacimovic
,
B.
, and
Genic
,
S.
,
2004
, “
The Influence of Heat Exchanger Performances on the Design of Indirect Geothermal Heating System
,”
Energy Build.
,
36
(
1
), pp.
9
14
.10.1016/S0378-7788(03)00036-7
20.
Jacimovic
,
B.
, and
Genic
,
S.
,
2011
, “
Tray Efficiency Versus Stripping Factor
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
,
50
(
12
), pp.
7445
7451
.10.1021/ie101052f
You do not currently have access to this content.