Constant speed fan exhaust systems are the most popular exhaust system in laboratory buildings since they satisfy building architectural requirement, and have low initial costs with reliable performance. The constant speed fan exhaust system maintains constant stack exit velocity to prevent toxic exhaust air downwash back to occupied areas near the building or on the roof top. To achieve constant velocity when the exhaust airflow is less than the design value, makeup air is introduced to the system at the inlet of the exhaust fan. Since the laboratory exhaust airflow is often significantly less than the design airflow, exhaust fans consume significantly more energy than is necessary. Multi-stack and Variable frequency drive techniques can reduce both the make-up airflow rate and fan energy in the constant speed fan exhaust system retrofit. This paper introduces the application principles, describes the optimal methods of stack sizing, and presents an example. The application example showed that the average annual fan power is 50% of the design fan power for a two-stack system, and 47% for a three-stack system.

1.
ASHRAE, 1999, “1999 ASHRAE Handbook, HVAC Applications,” American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-conditioning Engineering, Inc, Atlanta, GA, pp. 39.1–39.10.
2.
Varley
,
J. O.
,
1993
, “
The Measurement of Fume Hood use Diversity in an Industrial Laboratory
,”
ASHRAE Trans.
,
99
, Part 2, pp.
1072
1080
.
3.
Hitchings
,
D. T.
, and
Shull
,
R. S.
,
1993
, “
Measuring and Calculating Laboratory Exhaust Diversity—Three Case Studies
,”
ASHRAE Trans.
,
99
, Part 2, pp.
1059
1071
.
4.
Moyer
,
R.
, and
Dungan
,
J.
,
1987
, “
Turning Fume Hood Diversity into Energy Savings
,”
ASHRAE Trans.
,
93
, Part 2, pp.
1822
1832
.
5.
Rabiah
,
T. M.
, and
Wellenbach
,
J. W.
,
1993
, “
Determining Fume Hood Diversity Factors
,”
ASHRAE Trans.
,
99
, Part 2, pp.
1090
1096
.
6.
Wang, G., and Liu, M., “Energy Efficient Single Stack Exhaust Fan Systems E3S3F,” Proceedings of International Conference for Enhanced Building Operations, Austin, Texas, 2001, pp. 179–184.
You do not currently have access to this content.