The effect of rotation has been investigated with emphasis on the impact of blade geometry on the “correction factor” in stall models. The data used came from field tests and wind tunnel experiments performed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and were restricted to the steady-state nonyawed conditions. Three blade layouts were available; a blade with constant chord without twist (phase II), a blade with constant chord and twist (phases III and IV), and a tapered blade with twist (phase VI). Effects due to twist and taper were determined from comparison ofcnbetween the different blade layouts. The formulation of the stall model was rewritten so that the measuredcnvalues could be used without reference to 2D airfoil performance. This enabled a direct comparison of the normal force characteristics between the four blade stations of the selected blade configurations. In particular, the correction termfused in stall models for rotational effects was analyzed. The comparison between the test results with a straight and a twisted blade showed that a relation for twist+pitch is required inf. In addition, a dependency offon the angle-of-attack was identified in the measurements and it is recommended that this dependency be incorporated in the stall models.

1.
Schepers
,
J. G.
,
Brand
,
A. J.
,
Bruining
,
A.
,
Graham
,
J. M. R.
,
Hand
,
M. M.
,
Infield
,
D. G.
,
Madsen
,
H. A.
,
Paynter
,
R. J. H.
, and
Simms
,
D. A.
, 1997, “
Final Report of Annex XIV: Field Rotor Aerodynamics
,” Report ECN-C-97-027, Petten, The Netherlands, http://www.ecn.nl/wind/other/IEA/index.en.htmlhttp://www.ecn.nl/wind/other/IEA/index.en.html
2.
Schepers
,
J. G.
,
Brand
,
A. J.
,
Bruining
,
A.
,
Graham
,
J. M. R.
,
Hand
,
M. M.
,
Infield
,
D. G.
,
Madsen
,
H. A.
,
Maeda
,
T.
,
Paynter
,
R. J. H.
,
van Rooij
,
R.
,
Shimizu
,
Y.
,
Simms
,
D. A.
, and
Stefanatos
,
N.
, 2002, “
Final Report of Annex XVIII: Enhanced Field Rotor Aerodynamics Database
,” Report ECN-C-02-016 Petten, The Netherlands,
http://www.ecn.nl/wind/other/IEA/index.en.html
3.
Hand
,
M.
,
Simms
,
D.
,
Fingersh
,
L.
,
Jager
,
D.
,
Cotrell
,
J.
,
Schreck
,
S.
, and
Larwood
,
S.
, 2001, “
Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment Phase VI: Wind Tunnel Test Configurations and Available Data Campaigns
,” Report NREL/TP-500-29955, Golden, CA, USA.
4.
Schepers
,
J. G.
, and
van Rooij
,
R. P. J. O. M.
, 2003, “
Annexlyse, Inventory of analyses on IEA Annex XVIII Database
,” Task 1 report, Report ECN, The Netherlands, http://www.ecn.nl/wind/other/annexlyse.htmlhttp://www.ecn.nl/wind/other/annexlyse.html
5.
Schreck
,
S.
, and
Robinson
,
M.
, 2003, “
Boundary Layer State and Flow Field Structure Underlying Rotational Augmentation of Blade Aerodynamic Response
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
0199-6231,
125
,(
4
), pp.
448
456
.
6.
van Rooij
,
R. P. J. O. M.
,
Timmer
,
W. A.
, and
Bruining
,
A.
, 2002, “
IJking stromingsrichtingprobe door Windtunnel Metingen
,” Report TU-Delft, WE-02186, The Netherlands.
7.
Schepers
,
J. G.
,
Feigl
,
L.
,
van Rooij
,
R.
, and
Bruining
,
A.
, 2004, “
Validation of Aero-elastic Codes Using Detailed Aerodynamic Field Measurements
,”
Proceedings EWEA Conference, Delft, The Netherlands
, pp.
184
195
.
8.
Snel
,
H.
,
Houwink
,
R.
, and
Bosschers
,
J.
, 1993, “
Sectional Prediction of 3D Effects for Stalled Flow on Rotating Blades and Comparison with Measurements
,”
Proceedings of ECWEC, Lübeck-Travemünde, Germany
.
9.
Chaviaropoulos
,
P. K.
, and
Hansen
,
M. O. L.
, 2000, “
Invetigating 3D and Rotational Effects on Wind Turbine Blades by Means of a Quasi-3D Navier Stokes Solver
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202
122
,(
2
), pp.
330
336
.
10.
Du
,
Z.
, and
Selig
,
M. S.
, 1999, “
A 3D Stall Delay Model for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Performance Prediction
,”
Proceedings of ASME Wind Energy Symposium, AIAA, Reno, NV, USA
.
11.
Somers
,
D. M.
, “
Design and Experimental Results for the S809 Airfoil
,” Report NREL/SR-440-6918, Golden, CA, USA.
12.
van Rooij
,
R. P. J. O. M.
, 2004, “
The Effect of the Test Set-up (in the NASA Ames Experiment) on the Segment Performance of a Rotating Blade
,” IEA Joint Action, Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines, Annex 11, Montreal, Canada.
You do not currently have access to this content.