Pitching the individual blades of a horizontal-axis wind turbine allows control of asymmetric aerodynamic loads, which in turn influences structural loads in the nonrotating frame such as tower side-side bending. These loads are not easily controlled by traditional collective pitch algorithms. This paper presents the design of individual pitch control systems for implementation on the Controls Advanced Research Turbine (CART) in Colorado to verify controller performance for load attenuation. The control designs are based on linear time-periodic state-space models of the turbine and use optimal control methods for gain calculation. Comparisons are made between new individual pitch, new collective pitch, and baseline controller performance in both above rated and below rated wind conditions. Results from simulations show the potential of individual pitch to reduce tower side-side fatigue damage in above rated wind speeds (by 70% compared to baseline control) but with no improvement over collective pitch in below rated wind speeds. Fatigue load reductions in tower fore-aft, shaft torsion, and blade flap are also observed. From 13h of field testing, both collective and individual pitch controllers achieve a reduction in fatigue damage. However, the superior performance of individual pitch control observed in simulation was not verified by the field test results.

1.
Trudnowski
,
D.
, and
LeMieux
,
D.
, 2002, “
Independent Pitch Control using Rotor Position Feedback for Wind-Shear and Gravity Fatigue Reduction in a Wind Turbine
,” Proceedings, American Control Conference, Anchorage, Alaska, May 8–10, pp.
4335
4340
.
2.
Bossanyi
,
E. A.
, 2003, “
Individual Blade Pitch Control for Load Reduction
,”
Wind Energy
1095-4244,
6
, pp.
119
128
.
3.
Larsen
,
T. J.
,
Madsen
,
H. A.
, and
Thomsen
,
K.
, 2005, “
Active Load Reduction using Individual Pitch, Based on Local Blade Flow Measurements
,”
Wind Energy
1095-4244,
8
, pp.
67
80
.
4.
Stol
,
K. A.
, 2001, “
Dynamics Modeling and Periodic Control of Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbines
,” Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. Aerospace Eng. Sciences, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO.
5.
Stol
,
K. A.
, 2003, “
Disturbance Tracking and Blade Load Control of Wind Turbines in Variable-Speed Operation
,”
Proceedings, AIAA/ASME Wind Energy Symposium
, Reno, NV, January 6–9, pp.
317
323
.
6.
Fingersh
,
L. J.
, and
Johnson
,
K.
, 2002, “
Controls Advanced Research Turbine (CART) Commissioning and Baseline Data Collection
,” Technical Report, NREL/TP-500-32879, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
7.
Fingersh
,
L. J.
, and
Johnson
,
K.
, 2004, “
Baseline Results and Future Plans for the NREL Controls Advanced Research Turbine
,” Proceedings, AIAA/ASME Wind Energy Symposium, Reno, NV, January 5–8, pp.
87
93
.
8.
Wright
,
A. D.
,
Stol
,
K. A.
, and
Fingersh
,
L. J.
, 2005, “
Progress in Implementing and Testing State-Space Controls for the Controls Advanced Research Turbine
,” Proceedings, AIAA/ASME Wind Energy Symposium, Reno, NV, January 10–13.
9.
Stol
,
K. A.
, 2003, “
Geometry and Structural Properties for the Controls Advanced Research Turbine (CART) from Model Tuning
,” Technical Report, NREL/TP-500-32087, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
10.
Stol
,
K. A.
, and
Fingersh
,
L. J.
, 2004, “
Wind Turbine Field Testing of State-Space Control Designs
,” Technical Report, NREL/SR-500-35061, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
11.
Stol
,
K. A.
, and
Bir
,
G. S.
, 2003, “
User’s Guide for SymDyn, Version 1.2
,” NREL/EL-500-33845, NREL, Golden, CO.
12.
Avagliano
,
A.
,
Barbu
,
C.
,
Pierce
,
K.
, and
Suryanarayanan
,
S.
, 2004, “
A Comparison Study between Flex5 and SymDyn/AeroDyn
,” Proceedings, AIAA/ASME Wind Energy Symposium, Reno, NV, January 5–8, pp.
133
139
.
13.
AeroDyn, Software Package, Version 12.52, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
14.
Kwakernaak
,
H.
, and
Sivan
,
R.
, 1972,
Linear Optimal Control Systems
,
Wiley Interscience
, New York.
You do not currently have access to this content.