Abstract

Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers (STHEs) are commonly used in oil and gas plants to cool or heat process fluids. A possible issue when designing such systems is represented by the tube rupture scenario, when the internal HP (high-pressure) fluid is suddenly discharged to the LP (low-pressure) fluid in the shell. Since, usually, the tube and shell sides have different design pressures, this scenario must be analyzed to assess if the safety measures are fit to protect the weakest part of the system. The time evolution of this event is characterized by different phases; in the first one, a shock wave is generated and propagated very rapidly in the system, with a time scale in the order of a few ms. The phenomenon is so rapid that pressure relief devices are not effective. This kind of wave is normally not evaluated in the majority of available publications; however, it is deemed that it is of particular relevance for large-size SHTEs, due to their significant investment cost, and hence, a methodology has been developed in this work for the purpose. The main impact of such waves is expected in the LP piping connected to the exchanger. The amplitude of the shock wave at the source location, i.e., at the ruptured tube, is calculated based on the theory of the Riemann problem, with reference to different types of HP and LP fluids. Then, the relevant propagation up to the piping entrance is studied to estimate the wave damping and the effective wave amplitude impacting it. Both validation calculations and calculations referred to new design applications and existing installations are presented, and possible mitigation measures are proposed, if any.

References

1.
API 521
,
2020
,
Pressure-relieving and Depressuring Systems
, 7th ed.,
American Petroleum Institute
,
Washington, DC
.
2.
Fowler
,
D. W.
,
Herndon
,
T. R.
, and
Wahrmund
,
R. C.
,
1968
, “
An Analysis of Potential Overpressure of Heat Exchanger Shell Due to a Ruptured Tube
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Petroleum Division Conference
,
Dallas, TX
,
Sept. 22–25
.
3.
Sumaria
,
V. H.
,
Rovnak
,
J. A.
,
Heitner
,
I.
, and
Herbert
,
R. J.
,
1976
, “
Model to Predict Transient Consequences of a Heat Exchanger Tube Rupture
,”
API Proc.
,
55
(
41
), pp.
631
654
.
4.
Energy Institute
,
2000
,
Guidelines for the Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers to Withstand the Impact of Tube Failure
,
London, UK
.
5.
Energy Institute
,
2015
,
Guidelines for the Safe Design and Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers to Withstand the Impact of Tube Failure
, 2nd ed.,
London, UK
.
6.
Energy Institute Presentation
,
2016
, “
Overpressure Protection of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers
,”
Launch Seminar
,
London, UK
,
May
.
7.
Botros
,
K.
,
2015
, “
Importance of Accounting for the Piping System and Boundary Conditions in Determining the Maximum Surge Pressure Following Heat-Exchanger Tube-Rupture
,”
J. Loss Prev. Process Ind.
,
37
, pp.
63
73
.
8.
ASME B16.5
,
2020
,
Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings: NPS 1/2 through NPS 24, Metric/Inch Standard
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
New York
.
9.
Deddis
,
C.
,
2011
, “
Shell & Tube Heat Exchanger Overpressure Protection From Tube Rupture
,”
Energy Institute Meeting
,
London, UK
.
10.
Harhara
,
A.
, and
Hasan
,
M. M. F.
,
2020
, “
Dynamic Modeling of Heat Exchanger Tube Rupture
,”
BMC Chem. Eng.
,
2
(
5
), pp.
1
21
.
11.
Ennis
,
C. J.
,
Botros
,
K. K.
, and
Patel
,
C.
,
2011
, “
Dynamic Model for a Heat Exchanger Tube Rupture Discharging a High-Pressure Flashing Liquid Into a Low-Pressure Liquid-Filled Shell
,”
J. Loss Prev. Process Ind.
,
24
(
1
), pp.
111
121
.
12.
Walters
,
T. W.
, and
Leishear
,
R. A.
,
2018
, “
When the Joukowski Equation Does not Predict Maximum Water Hammer Pressures
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference PVP2018
,
Prague, Czech Republic
,
July 15–20
.
13.
Cassata
,
J.
,
Feng
,
Z.
,
Dasgupta
,
S.
, and
Samways
,
R.
,
1998
, “
Prevent Overpressure Failures on Heat Exchangers
,”
Hydrocarbon Process.
,
77
(
11
), pp.
123
128
.
14.
ASME B31.3
,
2016
,
Process Piping
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
New York
.
15.
Lee
,
M. Z.
,
2013
, “
Taming Water Hammer
,” Machine Design, Penton Media.
16.
Shapiro
,
A. H.
,
1953
,
The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow
,
John Wiley and Sons
,
Hoboken, NJ
.
17.
Landau
,
L. D.
, and
Lifshitz
,
E. M.
,
1987
,
Fluid Mechanics
, 2nd ed.,
Pergamon Press
,
Oxford, UK
.
18.
Terenzi
,
A.
,
2022
,
Flow Analysis for Hydrocarbon Pipeline Engineering
,
Gulf Professional Publishing
,
Cambridge, MA
.
19.
Munkejord
,
S. T.
, and
Papin
,
M.
,
2007
, “
The Effect of Interfacial Pressure in the Discrete-Equation Multiphase Model
,”
Comput. Fluids
,
36
, pp.
742
757
.
20.
Mao
,
Y.
,
Fang
,
Q.
, and
Zhang
,
Y.
,
2008
, “
Numerical Simulation of Water Mitigation Effects on Shock Wave With SPH Method
,”
Trans. Tianjin Univ.
,
14
(
5
), pp.
387
390
.
21.
Paillère
,
H.
,
Corre
,
C.
, and
Garcia Cascales
,
J. R.
,
2003
, “
On the Extension of the AUSM + Scheme to Compressible Two-Fluid Models
,”
Comput. Fluids
,
32
, pp.
891
916
.
22.
Liou
,
M.
,
Chang
,
C.
,
Nguyen
,
L.
, and
Theofanous
,
T. G.
,
2008
, “
How to Solve Compressible Multifluid Equations : A Simple, Robust and Accurate Method
,”
AIAA J.
,
46
(
9
), pp.
2345
2356
.
23.
Wallis
,
G. B.
,
1969
,
One-Dimensional Two-Phase Flow
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
24.
Toro
,
E. F.
,
1994
, “Riemann Solvers: Linearization and Adaption,”
Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics IV
,
M. J.
Baines
,
K. W.
Morton
, eds.,
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford, UK
.
25.
Press
,
W. H.
,
Teukolsky
,
S. A.
,
Vetterling
,
W. T.
, and
Flannery
,
B. P.
,
2007
,
Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing
, 3rd ed. ed.,
Cambridge University Press
,
New York
.
26.
Kinsler
,
L. E.
,
Frey
,
A. R.
,
Coppens
,
A. B.
, and
Sanders
,
J. V.
,
2000
,
Fundamentals of Acoustics
, 4th ed.,
Wiley
,
New York
.
27.
Gilmore
,
F. R.
,
1952
,
The Growth or Collapse of a Spherical Bubble in a Viscous Compressible Liquid
,
California Institute of Technology
,
Pasadena, CA
.
28.
Best
,
J. P.
,
1991
,
The Dynamics of Underwater Explosions
,
University of Wollongong
,
Australia
.
29.
Sulfredge
,
C. D.
,
Morris
,
R. H.
, and
Sanders
,
R. L.
,
2005
,
Calculating the Effect of Surface or Underwater Explosions on Submerged Equipment and Structures
,
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
,
Oak Ridge, TN
.
30.
Cole
,
R. H.
,
1948
,
Underwater Explosions
,
Princeton University Press
,
Princeton, NJ
.
31.
Pyatnitsky
,
L. N.
,
2009
,
Turbulence Nature and the Inverse Problem
,
Springer Science & Business Media
,
Dordrecht, The Netherlands
.
32.
Britan
,
A.
,
Igra
,
O.
,
Ben-Dor
,
G.
, and
Shapiro
,
H.
,
2006
, “
Shock Wave Attenuation by Grids and Orifice Plates
,”
Shock Waves
,
16
(
1
), pp.
1
15
.
33.
Wang
,
B.
, and
Xu
,
H.
,
2007
, “
A Method Based on Riemann Problem in Tracking Multi-Material Interface on Unstructured Moving Grids
,”
Eng. Appl. Comp. Fluid Mech.
,
1
(
4
), pp.
325
336
.
You do not currently have access to this content.