This paper studies the sensitivities of the asperity pressures and temperatures to the fluid pressure distribution in concentrated contacts operating in the regime of mixed-film lubrication. Two fluid pressure distributions are used in the study. One is a Hertz-like distribution that neglects micro-EHL responses of the lubricant, and the other models the micro-EHL effects with significant pressure rippling. The asperity pressures and temperatures are deterministically calculated in time by numerically solving the asperity-contact and the transient energy equations as the two surfaces move relative to each other. The contact is simulated for sufficient time duration until the samples of the calculated asperity variables reach a statistical equilibrium that reflects the random-process nature of the problem. Parametric analyses are carried out that cover a wide range of operating conditions of practical interest. The results obtained consistently suggest that the asperity pressures and temperatures are not sensitively related to the fluid pressure. This insensitivity supports the use of any fluid pressure distribution consistent with the underlying mixed-film problem, rather than determining it by numerically solving the Reynolds equation at every time step of the simulation process. The study lays a foundation on which to advance modeling of the mixed-film contacts with a proper balance among model robustness, computational efficiency and solution accuracy. [S0742-4787(00)01101-2]

1.
Chang
,
L.
,
1995
, “
A Deterministic Model for Partial Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
28
, No.
2
, pp.
75
83
.
2.
Jiang
,
X.
,
Cheng
,
H. S.
,
Hua
,
D.
,
Ai
,
X.
, and
Lee
,
S.
,
1999
, “
A Mixed Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication with Asperity Contacts
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
121
, pp.
481
491
.
3.
Qiu
,
L.
, and
Cheng
,
H. S.
,
1998
, “
Temperature Rise Simulation of Three-Dimensional Rough Surfaces in Mixed Lubricated Contact
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
120
, No.
2
, pp.
310
318
.
4.
Carslaw, H. S., and Jaeger, J. C., 1958, Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd ed., Oxford at the Clarendon Press, London.
5.
Zhai, X., and Chang, L., 1999, “A Transient Thermal Model for Mixed-Film Contacts,” Tribol. Trans., in press.
6.
Chang
,
L.
, and
Zhao
,
W.
,
1995
, “
Wavelength Dependence of Pressure Rippling in EHL with Random Surface–Roughness Profiles
,”
Tribol. Trans.
,
38
, No.
2
, pp.
389
395
.
7.
Chang
,
L.
, and
Gao
,
Y.
,
1999
, “
A Simple Numerical Method for Contact Analysis of Rough Surfaces
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
121
, pp.
425
432
.
8.
Johnson
,
K. L.
, and
Tevaarwerk
,
J. L.
,
1977
, “
Shear Behavior of Elastohydrodynamic Oil Films
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
356
, pp.
215
236
.
9.
Wang
,
S.
,
Cusano
,
C.
, and
Conry
,
T. F.
,
1991
, “
Thermal Analysis of Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Line Contact Using the Ree-Eyring Model
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
103
, No.
2
, pp.
232
244
.
10.
Elcoate, C. D., Evans, H. P., Hughes, T. G., and Snidle, R. W., 1998, “Thin Film, Time Dependent, Micro-EHL Solutions with Real Surface Roughness,” Proc. Leeds/Lyon Symp on Tribology, in press.
11.
Ai
,
X.
, and
Cheng
,
H. S.
,
1994
, “
A Transient EHL Analysis for Line Contacts with Measured Surface Roughness Using Multigrid Technique
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
116
, No.
3
, pp.
549
558
.
12.
Venner
,
C. H.
, and
ten Napel
,
W. E.
,
1992
, “
Surface Roughness Effects in an EHL Line Contact
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
114
, No.
3
, pp.
616
622
.
You do not currently have access to this content.