Superfinishing is an abrasive finishing process in which a smooth work surface is produced by simultaneously loading a bonded abrasive stone against a rotating workpiece surface and oscillating (reciprocating) the stone. The surface topography of a 600 grit aluminum oxide stone used for superfinishing is quantitatively described using scanning phase-shift interferometry. A bounded three-parameter lognormal distribution is found to provide a more accurate representation of cutting edge height distribution than a bounded normal distribution, especially in fitting the upper tail end of data. Moreover, the stone surface characteristics are nearly constant throughout stone life suggesting that superfinishing is a self-dressing process. This stone surface geometry is used to develop a contact mechanics model of the superfinishing process. The model estimates the number of cutting edges involved in material removal, the load distribution on these edges, and the resulting surface roughness of the superfinished surface. The effect of contact pressure on these estimated values has been studied. Only a very small percentage (less than 0.16 percent) of the cutting edges, which are comprised of the large cutting edges occurring in the tail end of distribution, are actively engaged in material removal. Further, the arithmetic average surface roughness, Ra, is found to be related to the average depth of penetration while the peak-to-valley surface roughness, Rt or Rtm, is related to the maximum depth of penetration. The prediction of surface roughness made with this model is found to agree reasonbly well with experimental results for superfinishing of hardened steel surfaces. [S0742-4787(00)00302-7]

1.
Knudsen
,
R. D.
,
1988
, “
Advances in Tapered Roller Bearing Design
,”
Power Transmission Design
,
6
, pp.
71
74
.
2.
Puthanangady
,
T. K.
, and
Malkin
,
S.
,
1995
, “
Experimental Investigation of the Superfinishing Prcess
,”
Wear
,
185
, pp.
173
182
.
3.
Chang
,
S. H.
,
Balasubramhanya
,
S.
,
Chandrasekar
,
S.
,
Farris
,
T. N.
, and
Hashimoto
,
F.
,
1997
, “
Forces and Specific Energy in Superfinishing of Hardened Steel
,”
Ann. CIRP
,
46
, No.
1
, pp.
257
260
.
4.
Chauhan
,
R.
,
Ahn
,
Y.
,
Chandrasekar
,
S.
, and
Farris
,
T. N.
,
1993
, “
Role of Indentation Fracture in Free Abrasive Machining of Ceramics
,”
Wear
,
162
, pp.
246
257
.
5.
Bulsara
,
V. H.
,
Ahn
,
Y.
,
Chandrasekar
,
S.
, and
Farris
,
T. N.
,
1998
, “
Mechanics of Polishing
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
45
, pp.
410
416
.
6.
Bulsara
,
V. H.
,
Ahn
,
Y.
,
Chandrasekar
,
S.
, and
Farris
,
T. N.
,
1997
, “
Polishing and Lapping Temperatures
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
119
, pp.
163
170
.
7.
Tabor, D., 1951, The Hardness of Metals, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
8.
Samuels, L. E., 1982, Metallographic Polishing by Mechanical Methods, 3rd Edition, American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH.
9.
Malkin, S., 1989, Grinding Technology: Theory and Application of Machining with Abrasives, Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester, U.K.
10.
Baul
,
R. M.
,
Graham
,
D.
, and
Scott
,
W.
,
1972
, “
Characterization of the Working Surface of Abrasive Wheels
,”
Tribology
,
2
, pp.
169
176
.
11.
Salje´
,
E.
, and
von See
,
M.
,
1987
, “
Process-Optimization in Honing
,”
Ann. CIRP
,
36
, No.
1
, pp.
235
239
.
12.
Sayles
,
R. S.
, and
Thomas
,
T. R.
,
1979
, “
Measurements of the Statistical Microgeometry of Engineering Surfaces
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
,
101
, pp.
409
418
.
13.
Greenwood
,
J. A.
,
1984
, “
A Unified Theory of Surface Roughness
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
393
, pp.
133
157
.
14.
Sayles
,
R. S.
, and
Thomas
,
T. R.
,
1976
, “
A Stochastic Explanation of Some Structural Properties of a Ground Surface
,”
Int. J. Production Res.
,
14
, No.
6
, pp.
641
655
.
15.
Cohen
,
A. C.
,
1951
, “
Estimating Parameters of Logarithmic-normal Distributions by Maximum Likelihood
,”
J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
,
46
, pp.
206
212
.
16.
Harter
,
H. L.
, and
Moore
,
A. H.
,
1966
, “
Local-maximum-likelihood Estimation of the Parameters of Three-parameter Lognormal Populations from Complete and Censored Samples
,”
J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
,
61
, pp.
842
851
.
17.
Salje´
,
E.
, and
Paulmann
,
R.
,
1988
, “
Relations Between Abrasive Processes
,”
Ann. CIRP
,
37
, No.
2
, pp.
641
648
.
18.
Dagnall, H., 1986, Exploring Surface Texture, 2nd Edition, Rank Taylor Hobson Limited, Leicester, England.
19.
Puthanangady, T. K., 1994, “Superfinishing of Steels,” Technical Paper MR94-169, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI.
20.
Onchi
,
Y.
,
Matsumori
,
N.
,
Ikawa
,
N.
, and
Shimada
,
S.
,
1995
, “
Porous Fine CBN Stones for High Removal Rate Superfinishing
,”
Ann. CIRP
,
44
, No.
1
, pp.
291
294
.
21.
Wulff, J., 1940, “The Metallurgy of Surface Finish,” Proceedings of the Special Summer Conference on Friction and Surface Finish, MIT, pp. 13–21.
22.
Sulima, A. M., and Evstigneev, M., 1974, Surface Integrity and Fatigue of Parts from High-Temperature and Titanium Alloys, Mashinostroyenye, Moscow (in Russian).
23.
Reason, R. E., 1962, “The Measurement of Surface Texture,” Modern Workshop Technology, Part II, H. W. Baker, ed., Macmillan, pp. 413–474.
24.
Rubert
,
M. P.
,
1959
, “
Confusion in Measuring Surface Roughness
,”
Engineering
,
23
, pp.
393
395
.
You do not currently have access to this content.