A methodology is presented for the optimization of a tribological contact configuration, namely, a multi-layered elastic structure under normal (frictionless) point contact loading. This work is aimed at developing an algorithm by which the finite element (FE) mesh and the corresponding structure may be generated automatically for each variation in the vector of design variables during optimization iterations. The FE model for contact analysis may be developed in a given commercial solver such as ABAQUS or ANSYS. To do this, a flexible mesh generator, which interfaces with the FE model and the optimizer, was developed. The optimization scheme is implemented using a simulated annealing (SA) algorithm as the optimizer, with an axisymmetric (point contact) FE indentation model in the commercial finite element solver ABAQUS. The results suggest that conventional optimization methods may be employed to examine the design of tribological contact configurations such as multi-layered structures, working seamlessly within the operating system shell (e.g., Unix), and the finite element solver.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
optimisation, tribology, mechanical contact, multilayers, friction
Topics:
Design, Optimization, Stress, Finite element model, Finite element analysis
1.
Wilson
,
E. A.
, and
Parson
,
B.
,
1970
, “
Finite Element Analysis of Elastic Contact Problems Using Differential Displacements
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
,
2
, pp.
387
–
395
.
2.
Chan
,
S. K.
, and
Tuba
,
I.
,
1971
, “
A Finite Element Method for Contact Problems of Solid Bodies, Part I. Theory and Validation
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
,
13
, pp.
615
–
626
.
3.
Komvopoulos
,
K.
,
1988
, “
Finite Element Analysis of Layered Elastic Solid in Normal Contact with a Rigid Surface
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
110
, pp.
477
–
485
.
4.
Haslinger
,
J.
,
Neittaanmaki
,
P.
, and
Tiihonen
,
T.
,
1986
, “
Shape Optimization of an Elastic Body in Contact Based on Penalization of State
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
31
, pp.
54
–
77
.
5.
Rodrigues, H. C., 1992, “A Mixed Variational Formulation for Shape Optimization With Contact Conditions,” CEMUL Report 92/09-3, University of Lisbon, Portugal.
6.
Conti
,
P.
,
Luparello
,
S.
, and
Pasta
,
A.
,
1997
, “
Layer Thickness Optimization in a Laminated Composite
,”
Composites, Part B
,
28B
(
3
), pp.
309
–
317
.
7.
Huang
,
M.
, and
Arora
,
J. S.
,
1997
, “
Optimal Design with Discrete Variables: Some Numerical Examples
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
,
40
, pp.
165
–
188
.
8.
Lamba Sukhwinder, S., and Rhodes, C. A., 1992, “Design Optimization of a Packing Material Using Finite Element Techniques,” Proceedings of the 1992 ASME International Computers in Engineering Conference and Exposition, San Francisco, CA, pp. 677–683.
9.
McClung, R. A., Rudolph, K. G., and LeMonds, J., 1996, “Thickness Optimization in the Structural Design of Engineering Thermoplastic Parts,” Proceedings of the 54th Annual Technical Conference, Society of Plastics Engineers, Brookfield, CT, 3, pp. 3201–3205.
10.
Roux
,
W. J.
,
Stander
,
N.
, and
Haftka
,
R. T.
,
1998
, “
Response Surface Approximations for Structural Optimization
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
,
42
(
3
), pp.
517
–
534
.
11.
Vanderplaats, G. N., 1984, Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design: with Applications, McGraw-Hill, NY.
12.
Corana
,
A.
,
Marchesi
,
M.
,
Martini
,
C.
, and
Ridella
,
S.
,
1987
, “
Minimizing Multimodal Functions of Continuous Variables with Simulated Annealing Algorithm
,”
ACM Trans. Math. Softw.
,
13
, pp.
262
–
280
.
13.
Belegundu, A. D., and Chandrupala, T., 1992, Optimization Concepts and Applications in Engineering, Prentice Hall.
14.
Gupta
,
P. K.
, and
Walowit
,
J. A.
,
1974
, “
Contact Stresses Between the Elastic Cylinder and a Layered Elastic Solid
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
,
96
, pp.
250
–
257
.
Copyright © 2002
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.