Abstract
Galling is a recurring phenomenon in deep drawing processes which requires frequent maintenance of tools to improve the product surface quality. Adhesive transfer of softer material on the hard tool surface results in sharp features which causes surface roughening of the tools and deterioration of deep drawn products. In this article, an adhesive wear model based on a deterministic approach is developed to predict the galling behavior in a deep drawing process. The model uses the surface topography, material properties and contact conditions to predict the surface roughening of tool surfaces under perfectly plastic conditions. The adhesive transfer of material is considered by the growth of the asperities based on its geometry for the increase in height and radial direction by preserving the original shape and volume consistency. The results of the multi-asperity models show the growth of the transfer layer and its effects due to load, sliding cycle, sliding distance, and affinity of the materials. The results show the influence of the above-said parameters and its applicability for deep drawing process conditions. The simulated results show an 85% level of confidence in comparison with the experiments from literature for the prediction of the surface evolution due to the galling mechanism.
Issue Section:
Friction and Wear
Keywords:
adhesion,
contact,
metalworking,
sliding,
surface properties and characterization,
surface roughness and asperities,
wear
Topics:
Adhesives,
Cycles,
Galling,
Shapes,
Stress,
Surface roughness,
Wear,
Geometry,
Deformation,
Metalworking,
Pressure
References
1.
Greenwood
, J. A.
, and Williamson
, J. B.
, 1966
, “Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces
,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A. Math. Phys. Sci.
, 295
(1442
), pp. 300
–319
. 2.
Christensen
, H.
, 1969
, “Stochastic Models for Hydrodynamic Lubrication of Rough Surfaces
,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.
, 184
(1
), pp. 1013
–1026
. 3.
Johnson
, K.
, Greenwood
, J.
, and Poon
, S.
, 1972
, “A Simple Theory of Asperity Contact in Elastohydro-Dynamic Lubrication
,” Wear
, 19
(1
), pp. 91
–108
. 4.
Chang
, W.-R.
, Etsion
, I.
, and Bogy
, D. B.
, 1988
, “Static Friction Coefficient Model for Metallic Rough Surfaces
,” ASME. J. Tribol.
, 110
(1
), pp. 57
–63
. 5.
Halling
, J.
, Arnell
, R.
, and Nuri
, K.
, 1988
, “The Elastic—Plastic Contact of Rough Surfaces and its Relevance in the Study of Wear
,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
, 202
(4
), pp. 269
–274
. 6.
Halling
, J.
, and Nuri
, K.
, 1991
, “Elastic/Plastic Contact of Surfaces Considering Ellipsoidal Asperities of Work-Hardening Multi-Phase Materials
,” Tribol. Int.
, 24
(5
), pp. 311
–319
. 7.
Greenwood
, J.
, 1984
, “A Unified Theory of Surface Roughness
,” Proc. R. Soc. London A. Math. Phys. Sci.
, 393
(1804
), pp. 133
–157
. 8.
Moalic
, H.
, Fitzpatrick
, J.A.
, and Torrance
, A.A.
, 1989
, “A Spectral Approach to the Analysis of Rough Surfaces
,” ASME. J. Tribol.
, 111
(2
), pp. 359
–363
. 9.
Chang
, W.
, Etsion
, I.
, and Bogy
, D. B.
, 1987
, “An Elastic-Plastic Model for the Contact of Rough Surfaces
,” ASME. J. Tribol.
, 109
(2
), pp. 257
–263
. 10.
Pullen
, J.
, and Williamson
, J.
, 1972
, “On the Plastic Contact of Rough Surfaces
,” Proc. R. Soc. London A. Math. Phys. Sci.
, 327
(1569
), pp. 159
–173
. 11.
Abbott
, E. J.
, and Firestone
, F. A.
, 1933
, “Specifying Surface Quality: A Method Based on Accurate Measurement and Comparison
,” J. Mech. Eng.
, 55
, pp. 569
–572
.12.
Nayak
, P.
, 1973
, “Random Process Model of Rough Surfaces in Plastic Contact
,” Wear
, 26
(3
), pp. 305
–333
. 13.
Lin and
, L. P.
, and Lin
, J. F.
, 2005
, “An Elastoplastic Microasperity Contact Model for Metallic Materials
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 127
(3
), pp. 666
–672
. 14.
Zhao
, Y.
, Maietta
, D. M.
, and Chang
, L.
, 2000
, “An Asperity Microcontact Model Incorporating the Transition From Elastic Deformation to Fully Plastic Flow
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 122
(1
), pp. 86
–93
. 15.
de Rooij
, M. B.
, and Schipper
, D. J.
, 2000
, “Analysis of Material Transfer From a Soft Workpiece to a Hard Tool: Part I—Lump Growth Model
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 123
(3
), pp. 469
–473
. 16.
de Rooij
, M. B.
, and Schipper
, D. J.
, 2000
, “Analysis of Material Transfer From a Soft Workpiece to a Hard Tool: Part II—Experimental Verification of the Proposed Lump Growth Model
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 123
(3
), pp. 474
–478
. 17.
Ma
, X.
, De Rooij
, M.
, and Schipper
, D.
, 2010
, “A Load Dependent Friction Model for Fully Plastic Contact Conditions
,” Wear
, 269
(11–12
), pp. 790
–796
. 18.
Hol
, J.
, Karupannasamy
, D.K.
, and Meinders
, T.
, 2012
, “Multi-Scale Friction Modeling for Manufacturing Processes: The Boundary Layer Regime
,” International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference
, Notre Dame, IN
, June 4–8
, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 1077
–1086
.19.
Cocks
, M.
, 1964
, “Role of Displaced Metal in the Sliding of Flat Metal Surfaces
,” J. Appl. Phys.
, 35
(6
), pp. 1807
–1814
. 20.
Landheer
, D.
, and Zaat
, J.
, 1974
, “The Mechanism of Metal Transfer in Sliding Friction
,” Wear
, 27
(1
), pp. 129
–145
. 21.
Bernick
, L. M.
, Hilsen
, R. R.
, and Wandrei
, C. L.
, 1978
, “Development of a Quantitative Sheet Galling Test
,” Wear
, 48
(2
), pp. 323
–346
. 22.
Torrance
, A.
, and Buckley
, T.
, 1996
, “A Slip-Line Field Model of Abrasive Wear
,” Wear
, 196
(1–2
), pp. 35
–45
. 23.
Challen
, J.
, and Oxley
, P.
, 1979
, “An Explanation of the Different Regimes of Friction and Wear Using Asperity Deformation Models
,” Wear
, 53
(2
), pp. 229
–243
. 24.
Schedin
, E.
, and Lehtinen
, B.
, 1993
, “Galling Mechanisms in Lubricated Systems: A Study of Sheet Metal Forming
,” Wear
, 170
(1
), pp. 119
–130
. 25.
Schedin
, E.
, 1994
, “Galling Mechanisms in Sheet Forming Operations
,” Wear
, 179
(1–2
), pp. 123
–128
. 26.
Roizard
, X.
, and von Stebut
, J.
, 1991
, “Wear Debris Formation and Tool Transfer Build-up in Sheet Metal Forming
,” Proceedings of the 18th Leeds Lyon Symposium on Tribology
, Institut National des Sciences Appliquees, Lyon, France
, Sept. 3–6
.27.
Lo
, S.-W.
, and Horng
, T.-C.
, 1999
, “Surface Roughening and Contact Behavior in Forming of Aluminum Sheet
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 121
(2
), pp. 224
–233
. 28.
Dohda
, K.
, and Kawai
, N.
, 1990
, “Compatibility Between Tool Materials and Workpiece in Sheet-Metal Ironing Process
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 112
(2
), pp. 275
–281
. 29.
Ahmed
, R.
, and Sutcliffe
, M. P. F.
, 2001
, “An Experimental Investigation of Surface Pit Evolution During Cold-Rolling or Drawing of Stainless Steel Strip
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 123
(1
), pp. 1
–7
. 30.
van der Heide
, E.
, and Schipper
, D. J.
, 2004
, “On the Frictional Heating in Single Summit Contacts: Towards Failure at Asperity Level in Lubricated Systems
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 126
(2
), pp. 275
–280
. 31.
Pothier
, J.-M.
, Roizard
, X.
, Hihn
, J. Y.
, Béteau
, J.-F.
, and Monteil
, G.
, 2005
, “Global Analysis Method of Friction Parameters in Strip-Drawing Tests
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 128
(2
), pp. 414
–421
. 32.
Mozgovoy
, S.
, Hardell
, J.
, Deng
, L.
, Oldenburg
, M.
, and Prakash
, B.
, 2017
, “Tribological Behavior of Tool Steel Under Press Hardening Conditions Using Simulative Tests
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 140
(1
), p. 011606
. 33.
Li
, W.
, Zhang
, L.
, Wu
, C.
, Cui
, Z.
, and Niu
, C.
, 2022
, “Influence of Tool and Workpiece Properties on the Wear of the Counterparts in Contact Sliding
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 144
(2
), p. 021702
. 34.
de Rooij
, M. B.
, van der Linde
, G.
, and Schipper
, D. J.
, 2013
, “Modelling Material Transfer on a Single Asperity Scale
,” Wear
, 307
(1–2
), pp. 198
–208
. 35.
Johnson
, K.
, 1970
, “The Correlation of Indentation Experiments
,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids
, 18
(2
), pp. 115
–126
. 36.
Almasri
, A.
, and Voyiadjis
, G. Z.
, 2008
, “Physically Based Constitutive Model for Body Centered Cubic Metals With Applications to Iron
,” J. Eng. Mech.
, 134
(7
), pp. 521
–529
. 37.
Yang
, Y.
, Huang
, L.
, and Shi
, Y.
, 2016
, “Adhesion Suppresses Atomic Wear in Single-Asperity Sliding
,” Wear
, 352–353
, pp. 31
–41
. 38.
Zhao
, K.
, and Aghababaei
, R.
, 2020
, “Adhesive Wear Law at the Single Asperity Level
,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids
, 143
, p. 104069
. 39.
Mishra
, T.
, de Rooij
, M.
, Shisode
, M.
, Hazrati
, J.
, and Schipper
, D. J.
, 2020
, “A Material Point Method Based Ploughing Model to Study the Effect of Asperity Geometry on the Ploughing Behaviour of an Elliptical Asperity
,” Tribol. Int.
, 142
, p. 106017
. 40.
Hokkirigawa
, K.
, and Kato
, K.
, 1988
, “An Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Ploughing, Cutting and Wedge Formation During Abrasive Wear
,” Tribol. Int.
, 21
(1
), pp. 51
–57
. 41.
Kayaba
, T.
, Kato
, K.
, and Hokkirigawa
, K.
, 1983
, “Theoretical Analysis of the Plastic Yielding of a Hard Asperity Sliding on a Soft Flat Surface
,” Wear
, 87
(2
), pp. 151
–161
. 42.
Menezes
, P. L.
, and Kailas
, S. V.
, 2008
, “Effect of Surface Roughness Parameters and Surface Texture on Friction and Transfer Layer Formation in tin–Steel Tribo-System
,” J. Mater. Process. Technol.
, 208
(1–3
), pp. 372
–382
. 43.
Menezes
, P. L.
, Kailas
, S. V.
, and Lovell
, M. R.
, 2011
, “Role of Surface Texture, Roughness, and Hardness on Friction During Unidirectional Sliding
,” Tribol. Lett.
, 41
(1
), pp. 1
–15
. 44.
Groche
, P.
, Christiany
, M.
, and Wu
, Y.
, 2019
, “Load-Dependent Wear in Sheet Metal Forming
,” Wear
, 422–423
, pp. 252
–260
. Copyright © 2021 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.
