Transonic compressor rotor performance is highly sensitive to variations in cascade area ratios. This paper reports on the design, experimental evaluation, and three-dimensional viscous analysis of four low-aspect-ratio transonic rotors that demonstrate the effects of cascade throat area, internal contraction, and trailing edge effective camber on compressor performance. The cascade throat area study revealed that tight throat margins result in increased high-speed efficiency with lower part-speed performance. Stall line was also improved slightly over a wide range of speeds with a lower throat-to-upstream capture area ratio. Higher internal contraction, expressed as throat-to-mouth area ratio, also results in increased design point peak efficiency, but again costs performance at the lower speeds. Reducing the trailing edge effective camber, expressed as throat-to-exit area ratio, results in an improvement in peak efficiency level without significantly lowering the stall line. Among all four rotors, the best high-speed efficiency was obtained by the rotor with a tight throat margin and highest internal contraction, but its efficiency was the lowest at part speed. The best compromise between high-speed and part-speed efficiency was achieved by the rotor with a large throat and a lower trailing edge effective camber. The difference in the shock structure and the shock boundary layer interaction of the four blade was analyzed using a three-dimensional viscous code. The analytical results are used to supplement the data and provide further insight into the detailed physics of the flow field.

1.
Copenhaver
W. W.
,
Hah
C.
, and
Puterbaugh
S. L.
,
1993
, “
Three-Dimensional Flow Phenomena in a Transonic, High-Through-Flow, Axial-Flow Compressor Stage
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
115
, pp.
240
248
.
2.
Hah, C., and Puterbaugh, S. L., 1990, “A Critical Evaluation of a Three-Dimensional Navier–Stokes Method as a Tool to Calculate Transonic Flows Inside a Low-Aspect-Ratio Compressor,” AGARD Conference Proceedings 510, CFD Techniques for Propulsion Applications, pp. 10-1–10-14.
3.
Jennions
I. K.
, and
Turner
M. G.
,
1993
a, “
Three-Dimensional Navier–Stokes Computations of Transonic Fan Flow Including a Novel Implementation of an Implicit k–ε Turbulence Model
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
115
, pp.
249
261
.
4.
Jennions
I. K.
, and
Turner
M. G.
,
1993
b, “
Three-Dimensional Navier–Stokes Computations of Transonic Fan Flow Using an Explicit-Flow Solver and an Implicit k–ε Solver
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
115
, pp.
261
272
.
5.
Kantrowitz, A., 1950, “The Supersonic Axial Flow Compressor,” NACA Report 974, 1950.
6.
Klapproth
J. F.
,
1961
, “
A Review of Supersonic Compressor Development
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Power
, Vol.
83
, No.
2
, pp.
258
268
.
7.
Law
C. H.
, and
Wadia
A. R.
,
1993
, “
Low Aspect Ratio Transonic Rotors: Part 1—Baseline Design and Performance
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
115
, No.
2
, pp.
218
225
.
8.
Parker, D. E., and Simonson, M. R., 1982, “Transonic Fan/Compressor Rotor Design Study, Vols. IV, V, VI,” AFWAL-TR-82-2017.
9.
Sellin, M. D., Puterbaugh, S. L., and Copenhaver, W. W., 1993, “Tip Shock Structures in Transonic Compressor Rotors,” AIAA Paper No. 93-1869.
10.
Smith, L. H., and Yeh, H., 1962, “Sweep and Dihedral Effects in Axial Flow Turbomachinery,” ASME Paper No. 62-WA-102.
11.
Wadia
A. R.
, and
Law
C. H.
,
1993
, “
Low Aspect Ratio Transonic Rotors: Part 2—Influence of Location of Maximum Thickness on Transonic Compressor Performance
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
115
, pp.
226
239
.
12.
Wennerstrom
A. J.
,
1994
, “
Experimental Study of a High-Through-Flow Transonic Axial Compressor Stage
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
, Vol.
106
, pp.
552
560
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.