Surface roughness on a stator blade was found to have a major effect on the three-dimensional (3D) separation at the hub of a single-stage low-speed axial compressor. The change in the separation with roughness worsened performance of the stage. A preliminary study was carried out to ascertain which part of the stator suction surface and at what operating condition the flow is most sensitive to roughness. The results show that stage performance is extremely sensitive to surface roughness around the leading edge and peak-suction regions, particularly for flow rates corresponding to design and lower values. Surface flow visualization and exit loss measurements show that the size of the separation, in terms of spanwise and chordwise extent, is increased with roughness present. Roughness produced the large 3D separation at design flow coefficient that is found for smooth blades nearer to stall. A simple model to simulate the effect of roughness was developed and, when included in a 3D Navier–Stokes calculation method, was shown to give good qualitative agreement with measurements.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
flow separation, flow visualisation, Navier-Stokes equations, computational fluid dynamics, surface roughness, boundary layers, compressors, stators
Topics:
Blades, Design, Flow (Dynamics), Stators, Suction, Surface roughness, Separation (Technology), Compressors, Pressure
1.
Gbadebo, S. A., Cumpsty, N. A., and Hynes, T. P., 2004, Three-dimensional Separations in Axial Compressors, ASME Paper GT-2004-53617.
2.
Suder, K. L., Chima, R. V., Strazisar, A. J., and Roberts, W. B., 1994, Effect of Adding Roughness and Thickness to a Transonic Axial Compressor Rotor, ASME Paper 94-GT-339.
3.
Bammert
,
K.
, and
Woelk
,
G. U.
,
1980
, “
Influence of the Blading Surface Roughness on the Aerodynamic Behavior and Characteristic of an Axial Compressor
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
102
, pp.
579
–
583
.
4.
Boyle
,
R. J.
,
1994
, “
Prediction of Surface Roughness and Incidence Effects on Turbine Performance
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
116
, pp.
745
–
751
.
5.
Cebeci
,
T.
, and
Chang
,
K. C.
,
1978
, “
Calculation of Incompressible Rough-Wall Boundary-Layer Flows
,”
AIAA J.
,
16
, pp.
730
–
735
.
6.
Chang, P. K., 1970, Separation of Flow, Interdisciplinary and Advanced Topics in Science and Engineering, Vol. 3, Pergamon Press.
7.
Place, J. M. M., 1997, “Three-Dimensional Flow in Axial Compressors,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
8.
Bolger, J. J., 1999, “Three-Dimensional Design of Compressor Blades,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
9.
Koch
,
C. C.
, and
Smith
,
L. H.
,
1976
, “
Loss Sources and Magnitudes in Axial Flow Compressors
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
98
, pp.
411
–
424
.
10.
Schlichting, H., 1979, Boundary Layer Theory, McGraw–Hill, New York.
11.
White, F. M., 1991, Viscous Fluid Flow, McGraw–Hill, New York.
12.
Denton
,
J. D.
,
1992
, “
Calculation of Three-Dimensional Viscous Flows Through Multistage Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
114
, pp.
18
–
26
.
13.
Denton, J. D., 1999, “Multistage Turbomachinery Flow Calculation Program-MULTIP,” Whittle Laboratory, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
14.
Gbadebo, S. A., 2003, “Three-Dimensional Separations in Compressors,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
15.
Cumpsty, N. A., 1989, Compressor Aerodynamics, Longman Scientific and Technical.
Copyright © 2004
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.