Three sets of low solidity steam turbine nozzle cascades were designed and tested. The objective was to reduce cost through a reduction in parts count while maintaining or improving performance. The primary application is for steam turbine high pressure sections where Mach numbers are subsonic and high levels of unguided turning can be tolerated. The base line design A has a ratio of pitch to axial chord of 1.2. This is the pitch diameter section of a 50% reaction stage that has been verified by multistage testing on steam to have a high level of efficiency. Designs B and C have ratios of pitch to axial chord of 1.5 and 1.8, respectively. All three designs satisfy the same inlet and exit vector diagrams. Analytical surface Mach number distributions and boundary layer transition predictions are presented. Extensive cascade test measurements were carried out for a broad incidence range from $−60to+35deg$. At each incidence, four outlet Mach numbers were tested, ranging from 0.2 to 0.8, with the corresponding Reynolds number variation from $1.8×105$ to $9.0×105$. Experimental results of loss coefficient and blade surface Mach number are presented and compared for the three cascades. The experimental results have demonstrated low losses over the tested Mach number range for a wide range of incidence from $−45to15deg$. Designs B and C have lower profile losses than design A. The associated flow physics is interpreted using the results of wake profile, blade surface Mach number distribution, and blade surface oil flow visualization, with the emphasis placed on the loss mechanisms for different flow conditions and the loss reduction mechanism with lower solidity. The effect of the higher profile loading of the lower solidity designs on increased end wall losses induced by increased secondary flow, especially on low aspect ratio designs, is the subject of ongoing studies.

1.
Cobley
,
K.
,
Coleman
,
N.
,
Siden
,
G.
, and
Arndt
,
N.
, 1997, “
Design of New Three Stage Low Pressure Turbine for the BMW Rolls-Royce BR715 Turbofan Engine
,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-419.
2.
Curtis
,
E. M.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
Banieghbal
,
M. R.
,
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Howell
,
R. J.
, 1996, “
Development of Blade Profiles for Low Pressure Turbine Application
,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-358.
3.
Tsujita
,
H.
,
Mizuki
,
S.
, and
Yamamoto
,
A.
, 2004, “
Numerical Investigation of Blade Profile Effects on Aerodynamic Performance of Ultra-Highly Loaded Turbine Cascades
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004–53429.
4.
Moustapha
,
S. H.
,
Paron
,
G. J.
, and
,
J. H.T.
, 1985, “
,” ASME Paper No. 85-GT-135.
5.
Solomon
,
W. J.
, 2000, “
Effects of Turbulence and Solidity on the Boundary Layer Development in a Low Pressure Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-273.
6.
Solomon
,
W. J.
, 2002, “
Performance Characteristics of a Reduced Solidity Low Pressure Turbine
,” ICAS 2002 Congress, pp.
5112.1
5112.10
.
7.
Howell
,
R. J.
,
Ramesh
,
O. N.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
Harvey
,
N. W.
, and
Schulte
,
V.
, 2000, “
High Lift and Aft Loaded Profiles for Low Pressure Turbines
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-261.
8.
Haselbach
,
F.
,
Schiffer
,
H.
,
Horsman
,
M.
,
Dressen
,
S.
,
Harvey
,
N.
, and
,
S.
, 2002, “
The Application of Ultra High Lift Blading in the BR715 LP Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
124
, pp.
45
51
.
9.
Howell
,
R. J.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
Schulte
,
V.
,
Stieger
,
R. D.
,
Schiffer
,
H.
,
Haselbach
,
F.
, and
Harvey
,
N. W.
, 2002, “
Boundary Layer Development in the BR710 and BR715 LP Turbines—The Implementation of High-Lift and Ultra-High-Lift Concepts
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
124
, pp.
385
392
.
10.
Hodson
,
H. P.
, and
Howell
,
R. J.
, 2001, “
High Lift Low Pressure Turbines
,” NASA∕CP-2001-210888.
11.
Gonzalez
,
P.
,
Ulizar
,
I.
,
Vazquez
,
R.
, and
Hodson
,
H. P.
, 2002, “
Pressure and Suction Surfaces Redesign for High-Lift Low-Pressure Turbines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
124
, pp.
161
166
.
12.
Houtermans
,
R.
,
Coton
,
T.
, and
Arts
,
T.
, 2003, “
Aerodynamic Performance of a Very High Lift LP Turbine Blade With Emphasis on Separation Prediction
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38802.
13.
Corriveau
,
D.
, and
Sjolander
,
S. A.
, 2003, “
Influence of Loading Distribution on The Performance of Transonic HP Turbine Blades
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38079.
14.
Patterson
,
D. J.
, and
Hoeger
,
M.
, 1986, “
The Effect of Reynolds Number and Velocity Distribution on LP Turbine Cascade Performance
,” ASME Paper No. 86-GT-271.
15.
Hashimoto
,
K.
, and
Kimura
,
T.
, 1984, “
Preliminary Study on Forward Loaded Cascades Designed With Inverse Method for Low Pressure Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. 84-GT-65.
16.
Hoheisel
,
H.
,
Kiock
,
R.
,
Lichtfuss
,
H. J.
, and
Fottner
,
L.
, 1987, “
Influence of Free-Stream Turbulence and Blade Pressure Gradient on Boundary Layer and Loss Behavior of Turbine Cascades
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
109
, pp.
210
219
.
17.
Boss
,
M.
,
Hofer
,
D.
,
Gazzillo
,
C.
, and
Jacobs
,
J.
, 2002, “
Advances in Combined-Cycle Steam Turbines
,”
Power-Gen International 2002
, Orlando, FL.
18.
Boss
,
M.
, 2003, “
Steam Turbine Technology Heats Up
,” PEi Mag., April.
19.
Drela
,
M.
, and
Youngren
,
H.
, 1996,
A User’s Guide to MISES 2.4
,
MIT Computational Aerospace Sciences Laboratory
,
Cambridge, MA
.
20.
Sieverding
,
C. H.
, 1993, “
,” Advanced Methods for Cascade Testing, AGARD-AG-328, p.
23
.
21.
Jouini
,
D. B. M.
,
Sjolander
,
S. A.
, and
Moustapha
,
S. H.
, 2001, “
Midspan Flow-Field Measurements for Two Transonic Linear Turbine Cascades at Off-Design Conditions
,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0493.
You do not currently have access to this content.