Research by de la Rosa Blanco et al. (“Influence of the State of the Inlet Endwall Boundary Layer on the Interaction Between the Pressure Surface Separation and the Endwall Flows,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A, 217, pp. 433–441) in a linear cascade of low pressure turbine (LPT) blades has shown that the position and strength of the vortices forming the endwall flows depend on the state of the inlet endwall boundary layer, i.e., whether it is laminar or turbulent. This determines, amongst other effects, the location where the inlet boundary layer rolls up into a passage vortex, the amount of fluid that is entrained into the passage vortex, and the interaction of the vortex with the pressure side separation bubble. As a consequence, the mass-averaged stagnation pressure loss and therefore the design of a LPT depend on the state of the inlet endwall boundary layer. Unfortunately, the state of the boundary layer along the hub and casing under realistic engine conditions is not known. The results presented in this paper are taken from hot-film measurements performed on the casing of the fourth stage of the nozzle guide vanes of the cold flow affordable near term low emission (ANTLE) LPT rig. These results are compared with those from a low speed linear cascade of similar LPT blades. In the four-stage LPT rig, a transitional boundary layer has been found on the platforms upstream of the leading edge of the blades. The boundary layer is more turbulent near the leading edge of the blade and for higher Reynolds numbers. Within the passage, for both the cold flow four-stage rig and the low speed linear cascade, the new inlet boundary layer formed behind the pressure leg of the horseshoe vortex is a transitional boundary layer. The transition process progresses from the pressure to the suction surface of the passage in the direction of the secondary flow.

1.
Senoo
,
Y.
, 1958, “
The Boundary Layer on the Endwall of a Turbine Nozzle Cascade
,”
Trans. ASME
0097-6822,
80
, pp.
1711
1720
.
2.
Langston
,
L. S.
,
Nice
,
M. L.
, and
Hooper
,
R. M.
, 1976, “
Three-Dimensional Flow Within a Turbine Cascade Passage
,” ASME Paper No. 76-GT-50.
3.
Moore
,
H.
, and
Gregory-Smith
,
D. G.
, 1996, “
Transition Effects on Secondary Flows in a Turbine Cascade
,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-100.
4.
Harrison
,
S.
, 1988, “
The Influence of Blade Stacking on Turbine Losses
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
5.
Ingram
,
G. L.
, 2003, “
Endwall Profiling for the Reduction of Secondary Flow in Turbines
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Durham, Durham, UK.
6.
Holley
,
B. M.
,
Becz
,
S.
, and
Langston
,
L. S.
, 2006, “
Measurement and Calculation of Turbine Cascade Endwall Pressure and Shear Stress
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
128
, pp.
232
239
.
7.
de la Rosa Blanco
,
E.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
Vazquez
,
R.
, and
Torre
,
D.
, 2003, “
Influence of the State of the Inlet Endwall Boundary Layer on the Interaction Between the Pressure Surface Separation and the Endwall Flows
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A
0957-6509,
217
, pp.
433
441
.
8.
de la Rosa Blanco
,
E.
, 2004, “
Secondary Flows in Low Pressure Turbines
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
9.
Vazquez
,
R.
,
Cadrecha
,
D.
, and
Torre
,
D.
, 2003, “
High Stage Loading Low Pressure Turbines. A New Proposal for an Efficiency Chart
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38374.
10.
Hodson
,
H. P.
, 1984, “
Boundary Layer and Loss Measurements on the Rotor of an Axial-Flow Turbine
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
106
, pp.
391
399
.
11.
Hodson
,
H. P.
, and
Dominy
,
R. G.
, 1987, “
The Off-Design Performance of a Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
109
, pp.
201
209
.
You do not currently have access to this content.