There has been a need for improved prediction methods for low pressure turbine (LPT) blades operating at low Reynolds numbers. This is known to occur when LPT blades are subjugated to high altitude operations causing a decrease in the inlet Reynolds number. Boundary layer separation is more likely to be present within the flowfield of the LPT stages due to increase in the region adverse pressure gradients on the blade suction surface. Accurate CFD predictions are needed in order to improve design methods and performance prediction of LPT stages operating at low Reynolds numbers. CFD models were created for the flow over two low pressure turbine blade designs using a new turbulent transitional flow model, originally developed by Walters and Leylek (2004, “A New Model for Boundary Layer Transition Using a Single Point RANS Approach,” ASME J. Turbomach., 126(1), pp. 193–202). Part I of this study applied Walters and Leylek’s model to a cascade CFD model of a LPT blade airfoil with a light loading level. Flows were simulated over a Reynolds number range of 15,000–100,000 and predicted the laminar-to-turbulent transitional flow behavior adequately. It showed significant improvement in performance prediction compared to conventional RANS turbulence models. Part II of this paper presents the application of the prediction methodology developed in Part I to both two-dimensional and three-dimensional cascade models of a largely separated LPT blade geometry with a high blade loading level. Comparisons were made with available experimental cascade results on the prediction of the inlet Reynolds number effect on surface static pressure distribution, suction surface boundary layer behavior, and the wake total pressure loss coefficient. The $kT-kL-ω$ transitional flow model accuracy was judged sufficient for an understanding of the flow behavior within the flow passage, and can identify when and where a separation event occurs. This model will provide the performance prediction needed for modeling of low Reynolds number effects on more complex geometries.

1.
Dorney
,
D. J.
,
Lake
,
J. P.
,
King
,
P. I.
, and
Ashpis
,
D. E.
, 2000, “
Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Losses in Low Pressure Turbine Blade Rows
,” AIAA Paper No. 2000-0737.
2.
Suzen
,
Y. B.
,
Huang
,
P. G.
,
Volino
,
R. J.
,
Corke
,
T. C.
,
Thomas
,
F. O.
,
Huang
,
J.
,
Lake
,
J. P.
, and
King
,
P. I.
, 2003, “
A Comprehensive CFD Study of Transitional Flows in Low-Pressure Turbines Under a Wide Range of Operating Conditions
,” AIAA Paper No. 2003-3591.
3.
Praisner
,
T. J.
, and
Clark
,
J. P.
, 2004, “
Predicting Transition in Turbomachinery—Part I: A Review and New Model Development
,” ASME Paper No. GT-2004-54108.
4.
Menter
,
F. R.
,
Langtry
,
R. B.
,
Likki
,
S. R.
,
Suzen
,
Y. B.
,
Huang
,
P. G.
, and
Völker
,
S.
, 2006, “
A Correlation-Based Transition Model Using Local Variables—Part I: Model Formulation
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
128
(
3
), pp.
413
422
.
5.
Walters
,
D. K.
, and
Leylek
,
J. H.
, 2004, “
A New Model for Boundary Layer Transition Using a Single Point RANS Approach
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
126
(
1
), pp.
193
202
.
6.
Holloway
,
D. S.
,
Walters
,
D. K.
, and
Leylek
,
J. H.
, 2004, “
Prediction of Unsteady, Separated Boundary Layer Over a Blunt Body for Laminar, Turbulent, and Transitional Flow
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
0271-2091,
45
(
12
), pp.
1291
1315
.
7.
Walters
,
D. K.
, and
Leylek
,
J. H.
, 2003, “
Prediction of Boundary-Layer Transition on Turbine Airfoil Profile Losses
,” ASME Paper No. IMECE 2003-41420.
8.
Walters
,
D. K.
, and
Leylek
,
J. H.
, 2005, “
Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Wake-Induced Transition on a Compressor-Like Flat Plate
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
127
(
1
), pp.
52
63
.
9.
Rizzetta
,
D. P.
, and
Visbal
M. R.
, 2003, “
Numerical Investigation of Transitional Flow Through a Low Pressure Turbine Cascade
,” AIAA Paper No. 2003-3587.
10.
Garmoe
,
T. L.
, 2005, “
Characterization of the GH1R Low Pressure Turbine
,” MS thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, WPAFB, OH, AFIT/DS/ENY/05-S02.
11.
Casey
,
J. P.
, 2004, “
Effect of Dimple Pattern on the Suppression of Boundary Layer Separation on a Low Pressure Turbine Blade
,” MS thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, WPAFB, OH, AFIT/GAE/ENY/04-M05.
12.
Woods
,
N.
,
Sondergaard
,
R.
,
McQuilling
,
M.
, and
Wolff
,
M.
, 2006, “
Investigation of Separation Control in Low Pressure Turbine Using Pulsed Vortex Generator Jets
,” AIAA Paper No. 2006-4450.
13.
Bons
,
J. P.
,
Sondergaard
,
R.
, and
Rivir
,
R. B.
, 1999, “
Control of Low-Pressure Turbine Separation Using Vortex Generator Jets
,” AIAA Paper No. 1999-0367.
14.
Visbal
,
M. R.
, 2009, “
High Fidelity Simulations of Transitional Flows Past a Plunging Airfoil
,” AIAA Paper No. 2009-391.
15.
Enomoto
,
S.
,
Hah
,
C.
, and
Loelbach
,
J.
, 2001, “
Numerical Investigation of a Low Reynolds Number Flow Field in a Turbine Blade Row
,” AIAA Paper No. 2001-0524.
16.
Singh
,
N.
,
Ghia
,
K.
, and
Ghia
,
U.
, 2005, “
Simulation of Separated Flow Inside a Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade
,” AIAA Paper No. 2005-1273.
17.
Gross
,
A.
, and
Fasel
,
H. F.
, 2005, “
Turbulence Modeling for Low Pressure Blades
,” AIAA Paper No. 2005-5292.
18.
Sanders
,
D. D.
,
O’Brien
,
W. F.
,
Sondergaard
,
R.
,
Polanka
,
M. D.
, and
Rabe
,
D. C.
, 2009, “
A Mixing Plane Model Investigation of Separation and Transitional Flow at Low Reynolds Numbers in a Multistage Low Pressure Turbine
,” AIAA Paper No. 2009-1467.
19.
Sanders
,
D. D.
,
O’Brien
,
W. F.
,
Sondergaard
,
R.
,
Polanka
,
M. D.
, and
Rabe
,
D. C.
, 2004, “
Turbulence Model Comparisons for Mixing Plane Simulations of a Multistage Low Pressure Turbine Operating at Low Reynolds Numbers
,” AIAA Paper No. 2009-4928.