Internal crossflow, or internal flow that is perpendicular to the overflowing mainstream, reduces film cooling effectiveness by disrupting the diffusion of coolant at the exit of axial shaped holes. Previous experimental investigations have shown that internal crossflow causes the coolant to bias toward one side of the diffuser and that the severity of the biasing scales with the inlet velocity ratio, VRi, or the ratio of crossflow velocity to the jet velocity in the metering section of the hole. It has been hypothesized and computationally predicted that internal crossflow produces an asymmetric swirling flow within the hole that causes the coolant to bias in the diffuser and that biasing contributes to ingestion of hot mainstream gas into the hole, which is undesirable. However, there are no experimental measurements as of yet to confirm these predictions. In the present study, in- and near-hole flow field and thermal field measurements were performed to investigate the flow structures and mainstream ingestion for a standard axial shaped hole fed by internal crossflow. Three different inlet velocity ratios of VRi = 0.24, 0.36, and 0.71 were tested at varying injection rates. Measurements were made in planes normal to the nominal direction of coolant flow at the outlet plane of the hole and at two downstream locations—x/d =0 and 5. The predicted swirling structure was observed for the highest inlet velocity ratio and flow within the hole was shown to scale with VRi. Ingestion within the diffuser was significant and also scaled with VRi. Downstream flow and thermal fields showed that increased biasing contributed to more severe jet detachment and coolant dispersion away from the surface.

References

1.
Bogard
,
D. G.
, and
Thole
,
K. A.
,
2006
, “
Gas Turbine Film Cooling
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
22
(
2
), pp.
249
270
.
2.
Bunker
,
R. S.
,
2005
, “
A Review of Shaped Hole Turbine Film-Cooling Technology
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
127
(
4
), pp.
441
453
.
3.
Gritsch
,
M.
,
Schulz
,
A.
, and
Wittig
,
S.
,
2003
, “
Effect of Internal Coolant Crossflow on the Effectiveness of Shaped Film-Cooling Holes
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
125
(
3
), pp.
547
554
.
4.
Saumweber
,
C.
, and
Schulz
,
A.
,
2008
, “
Comparison of the Cooling Performance of Cylindrical and Fan-Shaped Cooling Holes With Special Emphasis on the Effect of Internal Coolant Cross-Flow
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2008-51036.
5.
Saumweber
,
C.
, and
Schulz
,
A.
,
2012
, “
Effect of Geometry Variations on the Cooling Performance of Fan-Shaped Cooling Holes
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
134
(
6
), p.
061008
.
6.
McClintic
,
J. W.
,
Anderson
,
J. B.
,
Bogard
,
D. G.
,
Dyson
,
T. E.
, and
Webster
,
Z. D.
,
2017
, “
Effect of Internal Crossflow Velocity on Film Cooling Effectiveness—Part I: Axial Shaped Holes
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
140
(
1
), p.
011003
.
7.
Pietzryk
,
J. R.
,
Bogard
,
D. G.
, and
Crawford
,
M. E.
,
1989
, “
Hydrodynamic Measurements of Jets in Crossflow for Gas Turbine Film Cooling Applications
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
111
(
2
), pp.
139
145
.
8.
Pietzryk
,
J. R.
,
Bogard
,
D. G.
, and
Crawford
,
M. E.
,
1989
, “
Effects of Density Ratios on the Hydrodynamics of Film Cooling
,”
ASME
Paper No. 89-GT-175.
9.
Issakhanian
,
E.
,
Elkins
,
C. J.
, and
Eaton
,
J. K.
,
2012
, “
In-Hole and Mainflow Velocity Measurements of Low-Momentum Jets in Crossflow Emanating From Short Holes
,”
J. Exp. Fluids
,
53
(
6
), pp.
1765
1778
.
10.
Leylek
,
J. H.
, and
Zerkle
,
R. D.
,
1994
, “
Discrete-Jet Film Cooling: A Comparison of Computational Results With Experiments
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
116
(
3
), pp.
358
368
.
11.
Oliver
,
T. A.
,
Anderson
,
J. B.
,
Bogard
,
D. G.
,
Moser
,
R. D.
, and
Laskowski
,
G.
,
2017
, “
Implicit LES for Shaped-Hole Film Cooling Flow
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2017-63314.
12.
Schroeder
,
R. P.
, and
Thole
,
K. A.
,
2016
, “
Effects of High Freestream Turbulence on Flowfields of Shaped Film Cooling Holes
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
138
(
9
), p.
091001
.
13.
Kohli
,
A.
, and
Thole
,
K. A.
,
1998
, “
Entrance Effects on Diffused Film-Cooling Holes
,”
ASME
Paper No. 98-GT-402.
14.
Anderson
,
J. B.
,
Wilkes
,
E. K.
,
McClintic
,
J. W.
, and
Bogard
,
D. G.
, “
Effects of Freestream Mach Number, Reynolds Number, and Boundary Layer Thickness on Film Cooling Effectiveness of Shaped Holes
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-56152.
15.
Wilkes
,
E. K.
,
Anderson
,
J. B.
,
McClintic
,
J. W.
, and
Bogard
,
D. G.
,
2016
, “
An Investigation of Turbine Film Cooling Effectiveness With Shaped Holes and Internal Cross-Flow With Varying Operational Parameters
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-56162.
16.
Schroeder
,
R. P.
, and
Thole
,
K. A.
,
2014
, “
Adiabatic Effectiveness Measurements for a Baseline Shaped Film Cooling Hole
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-25992.
17.
Tavoularis
,
S.
,
2005
,
Measurement in Fluid Mechanics
,
Cambridge University Press
,
New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.