In this paper, the application of the substructure methodology to contact-impact analysis of flexible multibody systems is validated. Various impact model parameters that affect the model’s accuracy are presented. A contact-impact system is used that consists of a flexible cantilever bar longitudinally struck at its free end by a rigid body moving at a finite velocity. First, a dynamic model using the substructure method is established. Second, the initial conditions of the system’s dynamic responses during contact-impact are derived. Finally, a numeric contact-impact simulation is performed. The excellent agreement between the numeric solutions to both the substructure model and the analytical solutions demonstrates that the substructure model can successfully describe stress wave propagation within flexible bodies during contact-impact. The method can also clearly display the contact force time history and deformation distribution along the bar during contact-impact time and correctly predict the displacement of the contact surface of the flexible bar and the contact duration of the two bodies. It is shown that a larger substructure number will improve the accuracy of the numerical solutions, but an excessive number will lower the model’s accuracy since increasingly fine substructures increase the number of modal coordinates and lead to more serious computational round off errors and longer computational time.

1.
Khulief
,
Y. A.
, and
Shabana
,
A. A.
,
1986
, “
Dynamic Analysis of a Constrained System of Rigid and Flexible Bodies With Intermittent Motion
,”
ASME J. Mech., Transm., Autom. Des.
,
108
, pp.
38
45
.
2.
Rismantab-Sany
,
J.
, and
Shabana
,
A. A.
,
1990
, “
On the Use of the Momentum Balance in the Impact Analysis of Constrained Elastic Systems
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
,
112
, pp.
119
126
.
3.
Yigit
,
A. S.
,
Ulsoy
,
A. G.
, and
Scott
,
R. A.
,
1990
, “
Dynamics of a Radically Rotating Beam With Impact: Part 1: Theoretical and Computational Model
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
,
112
, pp.
65
70
.
4.
Dubowsky
,
S.
, and
Freudenstein
,
F.
,
1971
, “
Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Systems With Clearances, Part 1: Formation of Dynamic Mode, and Part 2: Dynamic Response
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
93
, pp.
305
316
.
5.
Hunt
,
K. H.
, and
Crossley
,
F. R. E.
,
1975
, “
Coefficient of Restitution Interpreted as Damping in Vibroimpact
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
42
, pp.
440
445
.
6.
Lankarani
,
H. M.
, and
Nikravesh
,
P. E.
,
1990
, “
A Contact Force Model With Hysteresis Damping for Impact Analysis of Multibody Systems
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
112
, pp.
369
375
.
7.
Yigit
,
A. S.
,
1995
, “
On the Use of an Elastic-Plastic Contact Law for the Impact of a Single Flexible Link
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
,
117
, pp.
527
533
.
8.
Qian, W., and Ye, K., 1956, Elastic Mechanics, The Science Press, Beijing.
9.
Wu
,
S. C.
, and
Haug
,
E. J.
,
1990
, “
A Substructure Technique for Dynamics of Flexible Mechanical Systems With Contact-Impact
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
112
(
9
), pp.
390
398
.
10.
Hong, J., 1999, Computational Dynamics of Multibody Systems, The Advanced Educational Press, Beijing.
11.
Liu
,
J.
, and
Hong
,
J.
, 1997, “Dynamic Analysis of Spacecraft Deployable Mechanism With Contact-Impact,” J. Astronaut. Sci., 18(3).
12.
Ma, X., 1992, Impact Dynamics, The Science and Engineering Press of Beijing, Beijing.
13.
Zukas, J. A., Nicholas, T., Swift, H. F., Greszczuk, L. B., and Curran, D. R., 1982, Impact Dynamics, A Wiley-Interscience Publication.
14.
Timoshenko, S., and Goodier, J. N., 1970, Theory of Elasticity, New York.
15.
Yin, X., Chen, H., and Jian, K., 1991, A Substructure Analysis in Structure Vibration, The Chinese Railway Press.
16.
Palas
,
H.
,
Hsu
,
W. C.
, and
Shabana
,
A. A.
,
1992
, “
On the Use of Momentum Balance and the Assumed Modes Method in Transverse Impact Problems
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
,
114
, pp.
364
373
.
You do not currently have access to this content.