In mechanical engineering a commonly used approach to attenuate vibration amplitudes in resonant conditions is the attachment of a dynamic vibration absorber. The optimal parameters for this damped spring-mass system are well known for single-degree-of-freedom undamped main systems (Den Hartog, J. P., 1956, Mechanical Vibrations, McGraw-Hill, New York). An important parameter when designing absorbers for multi-degree-of-freedom systems is the location of the absorber, i.e., where to physically attach it. This parameter has a large influence on the possible vibration reduction. Often, however, antinodal locations of a single mode are a priori taken as best attachment locations. This single mode approach loses accuracy when dealing with a large absorber mass or systems with closely spaced eigenfrequencies. To analyze the influence of the neighboring modes, the effect the absorber has on the eigenfrequencies of the undamped main system is studied. Given the absorber mass, we determine the absorber locations that provide eigenfrequencies shifted as far as possible from the resonance frequency as this improves the vibration attenuation. It is shown that for increasing absorber mass, the new eigenfrequencies cannot shift further than the neighboring antiresonances due to interlacing properties. Since these antiresonances depend on the attachment location, an optimal location can be found. A procedure that yields the optimal absorber location is described. This procedure combines information about the eigenvector of the mode to be controlled with knowledge about the neighboring antiresonances. As the neighboring antiresonances are a representation of the activity of the neighboring modes, the proposed method extends the commonly used single mode approach to a multimode approach. It seems that in resonance, a high activity of the neighboring modes has a negative effect on the vibration reduction.

1.
Frahm
,
H.
, 1909, “
Device for Damping Vibrations of Bodies
,” U.S. Patent No. 989,958.
2.
Den Hartog
,
J.
, 1956,
Mechanical Vibrations
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
3.
Ioi
,
T.
, and
Ikeda
,
K.
, 1978, “
On the Dynamic Damped Absorber of the Vibration System
,”
Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng.
0375-9466,
21
, pp.
64
71
.
4.
Warburton
,
G.
, and
Ayorinde
,
E.
, 1980, “
Optimum Absorber Parameters for Simple Systems
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
0098-8847,
8
, pp.
197
217
.
5.
Tsai
,
H. -C.
. and
Lin
,
G. -C.
, 1993, “
Optimum Tuned-Mass Dampers for Minimizing Steady-State Response of Support-Excited and Damped Systems
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
,
22
, pp.
957
973
. 0098-8847
6.
Igusa
,
T.
, and
Xu
,
K.
, 1994, “
Vibration Control Using Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
175
(
4
), pp.
491
503
.
7.
Pai
,
P. F.
, and
Schulz
,
M. J.
, 2000, “
A Refined Nonlinear Vibration Absorber
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
,
42
(
3
), pp.
537
560
. 0020-7403
8.
Hosek
,
M.
,
Olgac
,
N.
, and
Elmali
,
H.
, 1999, “
The Centrifugal Delayed Resonator as a Tunable Torsional Vibration Absorber for Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
,”
J. Vib. Control
1077-5463,
5
(
2
), pp.
299
322
.
9.
Mead
,
D.
, 1998,
Passive Vibration Control
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
10.
Sun
,
J.
,
Jolly
,
M.
, and
Norris
,
M.
, 1995, “
Passive, Adaptive and Active Tuned Vibration Absorber—A Survey
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472,
117
, pp.
234
242
.
11.
Rade
,
D.
, and
Valder
,
S.
, 2000, “
Optimisation of Dynamic Vibration Absorbers Over a Frequency Band
,”
Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
0888-3270,
14
(
5
), pp.
679
690
.
12.
Lee
,
C.
,
Chen
,
Y.
,
Chung
,
L.
, and
Wang
,
Y.
, 2006, “
Optimal Design Theories and Applications of Tuned Mass Dampers
,”
Eng. Struct.
0141-0296,
28
, pp.
43
53
.
13.
Hoang
,
N.
, and
Warnichai
,
P.
, 2005, “
Design of Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers by Using a Numerical Optimizer
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
0098-8847,
34
, pp.
125
144
.
14.
Ozer
,
M.
, and
Royston
,
T.
, 2005, “
Extending Den Hartog’s Vibration Absorber Technique to Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
0739-3717,
127
, pp.
341
350
.
15.
Vethecan
,
J.
, and
Subic
,
A.
, 2002, “
Measures of Location Effectiveness of Vibration Absorbers
,”
Int. J. Acoust. Vib.
1027-5851,
7
(
3
), pp.
131
140
.
16.
Sherman
,
J.
, and
Morrison
,
W.
, 1949, “
Adjustment of an Inverse Matrix Corresponding to Changes in the Elements of a Given Column or a Given Row of the Original Matrix
,”
Ann. Math. Stat.
0003-4851,
20
(
4
), p.
621
.
17.
Arnold
,
V.
, 1991,
Dynamical Systems III, Mathematical Aspects of Classical and Celestial Mechanics
, 2nd ed.,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin
.
18.
Preumont
,
A.
, 1997,
Vibration Control of Active Structures: An Introduction
,
Kluwer
,
Dordrecht
.
19.
Ewins
,
D.
, 1984,
Modal Testing: Theory and Practice
,
Research Studies Ltd.
,
Somerset
.
20.
Kailath
,
T.
, 1980,
Linear Systems
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
21.
Bishop
,
R.
, and
Johnson
,
D.
, 1979,
The Mechanics of Vibration
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
You do not currently have access to this content.