Fig. 7
Results for case 2. (a) Use of a multiresolution fitness function (NY(ML)=51, NY(MH)=601) resulted in similar optimal fitness to the baseline of NY = 601. (b) Use of NY = 51 transition matrices for the first 50 generations resulted in substantially decreased runtime.

Results for case 2. (a) Use of a multiresolution fitness function (⁠NY(ML)=51, NY(MH)=601⁠) resulted in similar optimal fitness to the baseline of NY = 601. (b) Use of NY = 51 transition matrices for the first 50 generations resulted in substantially decreased runtime.

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.
Accept